Nullification is where a state has a right to disagree with a federal law they think is unconstitutional and not correct, and no longer abide by it. Nullification would have weakened the Union because states would no longer have to agree or act on certain laws, causing obvious conflict within the state and conflict between Congress and the state. The state would no longer be unified and a quarrel between people in the state, the states, and between the state and the Congress would deepen and would most likely lead to war and weaken the Union.
<span>The correct answer is B. John C. Calhoun of South Carolina. Basically, he believed in nullification becasue he supported slavery, believing it was actually good. He claimed that states shuold have the right to have slaves even if the entire country and the federational government said that they shouldn't. He said that it was a minority right and that each individual state should be observed as a minority.</span>
<span> Henry Hudson and his shipmates after the mutinous crew aboard Discovery lost sight of them on that cold morning in June, 1611.
hope it helped
p.s by the way i love ur pfp</span>
I believe the answer is: Nationalist
Taiwan and China are involved in power struggle regarding Taiwan's independence status.
During the communist Era, Taiwan was indeed a part of Chinese government and set aside as a special region for international trading.
But now, the nationalist controlled the country which advocate for separation from China.
