1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
const2013 [10]
3 years ago
9

The death penalty, though legal in 32 states, is a cruel form of punishment and should be abolished because it doesn't do anythi

ng to deter criminals who are already going to commit a crime anyway and it is too expensive, costing almost three times as much as sentences someone to life in prison. What is the best way to revise this confusing sentence so that it is easier for the reader to understand? A. Add additional facts to the sentence. B. Fix the spelling and grammar mistakes. C. Break it into smaller, simpler sentences. D. Focus on a topic that is more relatable.
English
2 answers:
tekilochka [14]3 years ago
7 0

the actual answer is C


Pavel [41]3 years ago
5 0

C. Break it into smaller, simpler sentences.

By breaking into smaller, simpler sentences the ideas will be clearer. This sentence has too much going on. It takes a stance on the death penalty, gives two reasons for the position, as well as includes a piece of data. This is too much for just one sentence. Some of the grammatical errors will be fixed when the sentence is broken into smaller sentences. This eliminates option B as a possibility. Option A would only make the sentence even more complicated. Option D would defeat the entire purpose by changing to a different subject.

You might be interested in
A group of words lacking a subject and a predicate is called a(n __________.
Anna [14]
I think it might be called a phrase.
3 0
3 years ago
What is this article about?
Semmy [17]

Answer:

Never giving up

Explanation:

Brain list plsssssss

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the information presented in Passage 2, select two
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

limit funding for executive activities

reject presidential nominees

Explanation:

The principle of checks and balances within the three arms of government; Judiciary, Legislature and Executive was created so that no arm of the government would have too much power and each arm of government can check and balance each other.

This created what is called separation of powers and in this, the executive can limit some powers of the judiciary, or legislature, and vice versa.

Some of the roles of the legislature in checking the power of the executive branch include limit funding for executive activities and rejection of presidential nominees.

6 0
3 years ago
Example of direct speech and report speech:​
Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

Direct Speech: He says, “I am ill.” Indirect Speech: He says that he is ill.

8 0
3 years ago
What 2 complements can an action verb have
kari74 [83]
Predicate adjective and direct object
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How to write a good essay on a theme of a book
    13·1 answer
  • In "Making It by Faking it" by Robert Granfield,what did working-class students have to learn in order to "make it" in law schoo
    15·1 answer
  • Place the steps of the hero’a journey in the order that they occur.
    11·1 answer
  • Please help!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • What is the role of a neurologist among mental health professionals
    12·1 answer
  • Which theme is portrayed in this excerpt from leo tolstoy’s the death of ivan llyich ?
    10·1 answer
  • which of the following countries does the Nile flow through. answer Eritrea. Sudan. Chad. Gana. Uganda. I did K12 quiz and this
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the most plausible explanation for how the structure
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE! CAN ANYONE TELL ME IF I'M CORRECT? <br><br>I will give POINTS and BRAINLIEST
    12·2 answers
  • Please help!!
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!