1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lys-0071 [83]
3 years ago
11

Which of the following was a long-term impact of World War I? A. No war this large would ever happen again. B. European global p

ower began a decline. C. European global power increased. D. Chemical weapons were never used again.
History
2 answers:
weeeeeb [17]3 years ago
7 0

The right answer is B. European global power began a decline. After the end of the Great War a generation of europeans was wiped out. Devastation and loss of power was evident. The real winner after the war was only the United States. European countries had to reconstruct their countries in order to start their global power again.

gregori [183]3 years ago
6 0
B. European global power began a decline.
You might be interested in
Montesquieu came up with separation of power - how did james madison use his theory to create our government structure
lys-0071 [83]
Madison understood that power can corrupt as seen with the kings of their time. So Madison set up the form of government that relies on separate branches of government that operates under checks and balances. This means that no one branch can get too powerful and overrule the other branches. We see this in modern government in the legislative, executive and judicial branches. Madison improved upon the idea that power cannot be held by one man or a few people. 
7 0
3 years ago
PLSS HELP THIS DUE TODAY!! I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLYEST!!
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

Freedom rights are seen in the picture below

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How did the Gl Bill of rights help soldiers returning home from war after world war ll
Papessa [141]
The GI Bill of Rights was passed in 1944, and it encouraged veterans to go back to school. It gave them money to go back to school if they wanted to. So, I would say that the answer would be C. It provided financial aid for veterans going to college. Hope this helps! :)
7 0
4 years ago
Are there any complanies like.the East India Companies in existance today? how are they different?
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer

British East India Company. It turns out, that India was never originally colonized by the British crown, but by a multinational company (MNC). Robert Clive, who won the Battle Of Palashi (‘Plassey’ for ‘Hey bear, ek gin and tonic idaar!’ folks), was an employee (‘Team Leader’ in 21st-century terms) of the world’s first public limited company. (Britons had equity stakes and to make favorable trading deals, the company ended up having an army.)That hired army ended up ousting the weak-by-then Mughals and accidentally ended up with a nation. Ours. Yes, a large company, so influential and powerful, that it made laws of another nation. The modern equivalent would be if, say, Coca-Cola removed the Chinese premier and started running it. It’s unheard of, mad. But that’s what happened, and that is how I am writing this column in English and you’re reading it in English, both parties pretending as we folks have always been English speakers and writers. All because a bunch of company middle management wanted to protect their investments and threaten some nabobs for their tea and silk and spice and opium trade. And the company’s armies also meted out their version of justice. This begs the question: can a company do that? Today, if you visit the dockland area of London from where the East India Company ships once sailed, hundreds a day to rule Calcutta, Bombay, and Madras, there’s a wildlife reserve, a jogging track, an indoor concert hall called the O2 Arena, a bunch of suburban high-rises that look a bit like Whitefield in Bengaluru, and an HSBC call center. Zero signs that it was once the epicenter of the imperial world, ruling 3/4th of the planet with trade.

3 0
2 years ago
How was Justice for slaves (and all men of color) is different from justice for whites.​
Mashutka [201]
Many slaves and blacks did not get justice, and whites got off with a lot.The system was racially biased in the time period.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • why did the 2000 presidential election caused disunity in America and the controversy surrounding the election of George W. Bush
    6·1 answer
  • Predict what would happen to the price and equilibrium quantity if all the water for a school is cut off and people can only dri
    8·1 answer
  • What was one horror that Douglass experienced during his childhood?
    12·1 answer
  • In which case, policy, or situation did the motto “kill the Indian, but save the man” play an important role in western expansio
    8·2 answers
  • Founders who supported natural rights also supported adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because :
    13·2 answers
  • Why was Carnegie Steel able to offer its product at a lower price than its competitors?
    8·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLS??
    15·1 answer
  • Determine the credibility of Juvaini's account. Do you think he would have perhaps exaggerated or played down the extent of Mong
    11·2 answers
  • Which statements about the empire that ruled Persia in the year 300 CE are correct?
    13·1 answer
  • Which battle began on july 1, 1863, when the confederates entered a town for supplies and encountered union troops?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!