1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vedmedyk [2.9K]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following was not true concerning British involvement in India?

History
1 answer:
Hatshy [7]3 years ago
8 0
The answer to your question would be B. reason being... Britain wanted the natural resources that INDIA had so they set up a small British power named the British East India Company to run India and all its natural resource trade. <span />
You might be interested in
Why did some people disagree with using agent orange during the vietnam war?
Arlecino [84]
Some people disagree with using agent orange during the Vietnam war because the agent was dangerous and had adverse effects on both the enemy and the American troops. Agent orange was a powerful chemical used for defoliation during the Vietnam war to eliminate forest cover. It was later discovered that the chemical caused serious health issues for the service men, their families as well as the enemy. Health issues experienced include: birth defects, tumors, rashes, cancer, etc.
5 0
3 years ago
Explain how violence played a role in opposing religious views and conflicts during the 1500's
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

. . .

Explanation:

The statement attributed to Jesus "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword" has been interpreted by some as a call to arms for Christians. Mark Juergensmeyer argues that "despite its central tenets of love and peace, Christianity—like most traditions—has always had a violent side. The bloody history of the tradition has provided disturbing images and violent conflict is vividly portrayed in the Bible. This history and these biblical images have provided the raw material for theologically justifying the violence of contemporary Christian groups. For example, attacks on abortion clinics have been viewed not only as assaults on a practice that Christians regard as immoral, but also as skirmishes in a grand confrontation between forces of evil and good that has social and political implications. sometimes referred to as Spiritual warfare.

Higher law has been used to justify violence by Christians:(

Historically, according to René Girard, many Christians embraced violence when it became the state religion of the Roman Empire: "Beginning with Constantine, Christianity triumphed at the level of the state and soon began to cloak with its authority persecutions similar to those in which the early Christians were victims.^^

In 1095, at the Council of Clermont, Pope Urban II declared that some wars could be deemed as not only a bellum iustum ("just war" -.-), but could, in certain cases, rise to the level of a bellum sacrum (holy war):) Jill Claster, dean of New York University College of Arts and Science,[40] characterizes this as a "remarkable transformation in the ideology of war", shifting the justification of war from being not only "just" but "spiritually beneficial"D:Thomas Murphy[who?D: ] examined the Christian concept of Holy War, asking "how a culture formally dedicated to fulfilling the injunction to 'love thy neighbor as thyself' could move to a point where it sanctioned the use of violence against the alien both outside and inside society".[citation needed] The religious sanctioning of the concept of "holy war" was a turning point in Christian attitudes towards violence; "Pope Gregory VII made the Holy War possible by drastically altering the attitude of the church towards war... Hitherto a knight could obtain remission of sins only by giving up arms, but Urban invited him to gain forgiveness 'in and through the exercise of his martial skills'." A holy war was defined by the Roman Catholic Church as "war that is not only just, but justifying; that is, a war that confers positive spiritual merit on those who fight in it".

In the 12th century, Bernard of Clairvaux wrote: "'The knight of Christ may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently; for he serves Christ when he strikes, and saves himself when he falls.... When he inflicts death, it is to Christ's profit, and when he suffers death, it is his own gain.

The Roman Inquisition, during the second half of the 16th century, was responsible for prosecuting individuals accused of a wide array of crimes relating to religious doctrine or alternate religious doctrine or alternate religious beliefs. Out of 51,000 — 75,000 cases judged by the Inquisition in Italy after 1542, around 1,250 resulted in a death sentence Violence was ubiquitous in sixteenth and seventeenth- century Europe; its control and suppression are fundamental to the very idea of early modernity. It was during this period that violence was first perceived as a constant feature of the human condition and identified as a major social and political problem, inspiring writers, painters and philosophers to address the issue. Religious division exacerbated civil conflict, but contrary to what one might expect, this period also saw a reduction in interpersonal violence, the use of torture and capital punishment. This module investigates this apparent paradox, using violence to understand the tremendous social, political and religious upheavals of the age, while at the same time exploring the possibilities for peace, co-existence and civility hope this helped :)

4 0
2 years ago
What is the significance of the English Bill of Rights on the development of the U.S Constitution?
guapka [62]

Some believed that the Constitution did not give the new federal government the ability to restrict inherent rights, so no list of those rights was necessary. Others worried that if the rights were listed, they would invariably forget some and the list would ever be incomplete. Finally, the argument was that the states each had their own constitutions, too, and that rights were best protected at a state level.

6 0
3 years ago
1. The biggest issue dividing the U.S. in the years leading up to the Civil War was ____________ .
noname [10]

Answer:

1. Slavery

2. Republicans

3. Democrats

Explanation:

Slavery is the main reason the states fought and was a prevalent issue in the states for a long time mainly starting at the 3/5ths compromise. The two parties of Republican and Democrat were origianlly created as a single party, lead by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, but were split into the Whig Party and The Democrats after a political division inside the party about the election of 1824. In the mid-nineteenth century the Democrats were split on the issue of slavery and eventually the Democrats in the north (+ the Whig Party and some other politicians) joined together to make a new Republican party that was against slavery (leaving the southern Democrats as pro-slavery).

7 0
2 years ago
Complete the diagram below about the US government The​
SOVA2 [1]

Answer: ?

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Plz help I will be thankful
    15·1 answer
  • What was the proclamation of 1763 and how did this affect relations between colonies and Britain
    6·1 answer
  • How did humanity start?
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the Tet Offensive considered a turning point in the Vietnam War?
    14·2 answers
  • What did you have to be or own in order to be a citizen in Greece
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following did Marx believe? Select all that apply. Paris is an unfriendly city to its workers. Cycles of production
    6·1 answer
  • Question 3 of 10
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I NEED IT FOR APUSH
    7·1 answer
  • in two paragraphs summarize the contributions of muslim scholars in the area of astronomy, medicine, mathematics, and geography
    9·1 answer
  • PLZ Help!! Will give brainliest.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!