Answer:
The correct answer is option A, She received many honors for this achievement, such as the Distinguished Flying Cross from Congress.
Explanation:
This is because option B, Sadly, Earhart’s plane disappeared, and, despite search and rescue attempts, she was never found, is not an achievement which is what most use in a yearbook or analysis of a person or thing.
Option C, She made a first attempt that failed and damaged her plane, is not a goal she reached either. As it was more of a difficulty instead. It was a challenge she had to overcome and not her goal. So it would not likely be included in a yearbook about Amelia Earhart.
Option D, That adventurous spirit remained as she grew older, would most likely be excluded from the yearbook as well because it is more of how Amelia felt and not her timeline. Which is what most yearbooks are, timelines of a certain character. But this would be by second guess because they also include phrases and sometimes feelings in the yearbook as well.
But if I were to answer I would choose option A because flying across Congress is a big accomplishment. So is receiving honors and other rewards.
That's why I would choose option A, She received many honors for this achievement, such as the Distinguished Flying Cross from Congress.
Answer:
Tom's death is linked to the title of the novel because just how mockingbirds do nothing but sing, Tom Robinson did nothing wrong and only helped Mayella. ... The people of Maycomb seem to move on fairly over the death of Tom Robinson.
Explanation:
Answer:
To start off emm your doing math in a reading/writing topic. Anyways 4x2 would be 8 so your x would be 8 and 2x6 would be 12 so since you minus them you would get 4
Although all four excerpts are disgusting, we should single out one of them.
"Shooting an Elephant" George Orwell is a story of imperialism and the ratio of the local population inhabited by Imperial Britain. Imperialism is the most powerful force in world history. It exists today, moved from the colonial era to neo-colonial or neo-imperialism. During this transition, modes and strategies were changed, but the goal remained the same - to rule and exploit the natives, using their strength, military, economic and technological.
Killing an elephant shows various aspects of imperialism, imperialism is a double sword that inflicts damage on both sides, the local population and the British officer representing the imperial empire. When he killed the animal, he had to calm the Burmese. The fact that the Burmese decides what the imperial officer must do about it, provides an ironic image of a master who becomes a slave to fulfill his racial and imperial duties. Here, Orwell asks an important question: if an officer, a good man, can be corrupted and destroyed by imperialism, what happens to those who are not so honest?
The officer is aware of the malevolence of imperialism, but he is also aware of the ways in which beasts turn locals under the influence of imperialism. Local Buddhist priests laugh at him because in essence it was not necessary to kill an elephant, which was the consequence of his clumsy decision. However, there is no greater embarrassment than laughter in the face, sent to the white officer of the British Empire.
An excerpt from "Shooting an Elephant" that best demonstrates the dual destructive influence of imperialism, both on the local and the imperialist ones, is C).
Answer:
Definition 4 is the answer. Quite obvious, is this a trick question? lol