1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
3 years ago
10

President Carter and Soviet premier Leonid Brezhnev signed an agreement known as SALT II. However, President Carter did not push

the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty. Why did President Carter not fight for SALT II?
History
2 answers:
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
7 0

During a summit meeting in Vienna, President Jimmy Carter and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev sign the SALT-II agreement dealing with limitations and guidelines for nuclear weapons. The treaty, which never formally went into effect, proved to be one of the most controversial U.S.-Soviet agreements of the Cold War.

The SALT-II agreement was the result of many nagging issues left over from the successful SALT-I treaty of 1972. Though the 1972 treaty limited a wide variety of nuclear weapons, many issues remained unresolved. Talks between the United States and the Soviet Union began almost immediately after SALT-I was ratified by both nations in 1972. Those talks failed to achieve any new breakthroughs, however. By 1979, both the United States and Soviet Union were eager to revitalize the process. For the United States, fear that the Soviets were leaping ahead in the arms race was the primary motivator. For the Soviet Union, the increasingly close relationship between America and communist China was a cause for growing concern.

In June 1979, Carter and Brezhnev met in Vienna and signed the SALT-II agreement. The treaty basically established numerical equality between the two nations in terms of nuclear weapons delivery systems. It also limited the number of MIRV missiles (missiles with multiple, independent nuclear warheads). In truth, the treaty did little or nothing to stop, or even substantially slow down, the arms race. Nevertheless, it met with unrelenting criticism in the United States. The treaty was denounced as a “sellout” to the Soviets, one that would leave America virtually defenseless against a whole range of new weapons not mentioned in the agreement. Even supporters of arms control were less than enthusiastic about the treaty, since it did little to actually control arms.

Debate over SALT-II in the U.S. Congress continued for months. In December 1979, however, the Soviets launched an invasion of Afghanistan. The Soviet attack effectively killed any chance of SALT-II being passed, and Carter ensured this by withdrawing the treaty from the Senate in January 1980. SALT-II thus remained signed, but unratified. During the 1980s, both nations agreed to respect the agreement until such time as new arms negotiations could take place.

Minchanka [31]3 years ago
5 0

President Carter did not push the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty, President Carter did not fight for SALT II <em>because the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan</em>. With new tensions arising between the superpowers, President Carter removed the SALT II from Senate consideration in January 1980. Both SALT I and SALT II, Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, were aimed at curtailing the manufacture of nuclear missiles.

You might be interested in
The Moors were ______________.<br> Buddhists<br> Mulims<br> Catholics<br> Lutherans
lys-0071 [83]
<span>Muslims

</span>The Moors were MUSLIMS.<span>They were desperate, despairing and, urge and desire the need for the Muslim to rule saying, “We like your rule and justice far better than the state of oppression and tyranny in which we were. The army of Heraclíus we shall indeed… repulse from the city”. They wanted and favored the justice and system of the Muslims instead of the Byzantine’s. In which case, this case the Muslim’s won the battle and the Hims started to welcome them into their gates. 
</span>
NOT:
Buddhists
Catholics
Lutherans
4 0
3 years ago
Linda C. Brown, Rosa Parks, Elizabeth Eckford, Emmett Till, and the Greensboro Four, are emblematic of a recurring theme that em
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

The people mentioned above were emblematic because they fought for racial segregation, in addition to being victims of strong racism that severely damaged their lives. The loss of these people was what attracted Americans' sympathy.

Explanation:

Racism is extremely damaging, as we all know, and although many Americans are still hurt by it, in the early days of the civil rights movement they were hurt even more. People humiliated them, embarrassed them, limited them and even killed them, as happened with Emmett Till, just because they were black. All the names mentioned above, suffered this type of thing because of racism, which caused the empathy of some Americans who recognized how inhumane these actions were and should be repudiated.

4 0
2 years ago
What name was given to the side of world war one that the United States eventually joined
blsea [12.9K]

the name of the side which america fought on was called The Allies

3 0
3 years ago
Which of these events happend last? (5 points)
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

Where are the options? Rewrite it again.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was jeffersons foreign policy challenged?
ikadub [295]
In the Chesapeake Affair of 1807, a major challenge<span> to American neutral rights.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • People are provided information from parties and interest groups through the
    5·1 answer
  • The mid-Atlantic colony of Pennsylvania was founded by William Penn PRIMARILY because of his
    5·1 answer
  • Up until the twentieth century, the Atlantic slave trade marked the largest intercontinental migration of people in history.
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HURRY NEED THIS FAST!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Describe the ways in which the U.S. Government, local governments, and/or individuals attempted to interfere with the specific c
    14·1 answer
  • Amendment guarantees a person accused of a crime a speedy and public trial However, a trial can be too speedy or too public. Giv
    13·1 answer
  • Can you guys help me, thanks.
    5·1 answer
  • What was a primary challenge faced by the Jamestown colonists during the first few years
    9·2 answers
  • Does 3m-5=2m have one solution
    13·2 answers
  • Which factors led to the growth of the pan-arabism movement? check all that apply.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!