1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
3 years ago
10

President Carter and Soviet premier Leonid Brezhnev signed an agreement known as SALT II. However, President Carter did not push

the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty. Why did President Carter not fight for SALT II?
History
2 answers:
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
7 0

During a summit meeting in Vienna, President Jimmy Carter and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev sign the SALT-II agreement dealing with limitations and guidelines for nuclear weapons. The treaty, which never formally went into effect, proved to be one of the most controversial U.S.-Soviet agreements of the Cold War.

The SALT-II agreement was the result of many nagging issues left over from the successful SALT-I treaty of 1972. Though the 1972 treaty limited a wide variety of nuclear weapons, many issues remained unresolved. Talks between the United States and the Soviet Union began almost immediately after SALT-I was ratified by both nations in 1972. Those talks failed to achieve any new breakthroughs, however. By 1979, both the United States and Soviet Union were eager to revitalize the process. For the United States, fear that the Soviets were leaping ahead in the arms race was the primary motivator. For the Soviet Union, the increasingly close relationship between America and communist China was a cause for growing concern.

In June 1979, Carter and Brezhnev met in Vienna and signed the SALT-II agreement. The treaty basically established numerical equality between the two nations in terms of nuclear weapons delivery systems. It also limited the number of MIRV missiles (missiles with multiple, independent nuclear warheads). In truth, the treaty did little or nothing to stop, or even substantially slow down, the arms race. Nevertheless, it met with unrelenting criticism in the United States. The treaty was denounced as a “sellout” to the Soviets, one that would leave America virtually defenseless against a whole range of new weapons not mentioned in the agreement. Even supporters of arms control were less than enthusiastic about the treaty, since it did little to actually control arms.

Debate over SALT-II in the U.S. Congress continued for months. In December 1979, however, the Soviets launched an invasion of Afghanistan. The Soviet attack effectively killed any chance of SALT-II being passed, and Carter ensured this by withdrawing the treaty from the Senate in January 1980. SALT-II thus remained signed, but unratified. During the 1980s, both nations agreed to respect the agreement until such time as new arms negotiations could take place.

Minchanka [31]3 years ago
5 0

President Carter did not push the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty, President Carter did not fight for SALT II <em>because the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan</em>. With new tensions arising between the superpowers, President Carter removed the SALT II from Senate consideration in January 1980. Both SALT I and SALT II, Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, were aimed at curtailing the manufacture of nuclear missiles.

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer.
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:C

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What can we learn about ancient the Egyptian world from the Great Pyramid at Giza?
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

A or D

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast the challenges and opportunities available to immigrants in the north and the west in the period 1865 and 1
oksano4ka [1.4K]
In the period 1865 to 1910, the immigrants faced many challenges and also embarked in the opportunities available to them in the North and the West. The main challenge was related to job hunting. I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
3 0
3 years ago
Are brochures and tickets a secondary or primary source?
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

secondary

Explanation:

because they help to get information which others already know or which are extracted from others

3 0
3 years ago
How did Frederick Douglass escape from slavery?
lilavasa [31]
He dressed himself as a sailor and snuck on a train to New York (free country).
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which major geographic feature has hindered cultural diffusion betw
    8·1 answer
  • Which was a new deal program instituted by franklin roosevelt
    12·2 answers
  • God led Israel out of Egypt by the shorter way of the Philistines. <br> True<br> False
    8·2 answers
  • "Africa got decolonized at the cost of never-ending poverty, conflicts and diseases" explain with examples
    10·1 answer
  • Where Is Jamestown located
    9·2 answers
  • What was first brought to west Africa by caravan traders
    7·1 answer
  • How did caesar augustus improve farming?
    7·1 answer
  • The French and the British_____ A) tried unsuccessfully to work together in the fur trade B) were both uninterested in expanding
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE I REALLY NEED TO KNOW ASAP
    12·1 answer
  • The ___ involved the shooting of citizens by some British soldiers.
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!