1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
3 years ago
10

President Carter and Soviet premier Leonid Brezhnev signed an agreement known as SALT II. However, President Carter did not push

the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty. Why did President Carter not fight for SALT II?
History
2 answers:
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
7 0

During a summit meeting in Vienna, President Jimmy Carter and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev sign the SALT-II agreement dealing with limitations and guidelines for nuclear weapons. The treaty, which never formally went into effect, proved to be one of the most controversial U.S.-Soviet agreements of the Cold War.

The SALT-II agreement was the result of many nagging issues left over from the successful SALT-I treaty of 1972. Though the 1972 treaty limited a wide variety of nuclear weapons, many issues remained unresolved. Talks between the United States and the Soviet Union began almost immediately after SALT-I was ratified by both nations in 1972. Those talks failed to achieve any new breakthroughs, however. By 1979, both the United States and Soviet Union were eager to revitalize the process. For the United States, fear that the Soviets were leaping ahead in the arms race was the primary motivator. For the Soviet Union, the increasingly close relationship between America and communist China was a cause for growing concern.

In June 1979, Carter and Brezhnev met in Vienna and signed the SALT-II agreement. The treaty basically established numerical equality between the two nations in terms of nuclear weapons delivery systems. It also limited the number of MIRV missiles (missiles with multiple, independent nuclear warheads). In truth, the treaty did little or nothing to stop, or even substantially slow down, the arms race. Nevertheless, it met with unrelenting criticism in the United States. The treaty was denounced as a “sellout” to the Soviets, one that would leave America virtually defenseless against a whole range of new weapons not mentioned in the agreement. Even supporters of arms control were less than enthusiastic about the treaty, since it did little to actually control arms.

Debate over SALT-II in the U.S. Congress continued for months. In December 1979, however, the Soviets launched an invasion of Afghanistan. The Soviet attack effectively killed any chance of SALT-II being passed, and Carter ensured this by withdrawing the treaty from the Senate in January 1980. SALT-II thus remained signed, but unratified. During the 1980s, both nations agreed to respect the agreement until such time as new arms negotiations could take place.

Minchanka [31]3 years ago
5 0

President Carter did not push the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty, President Carter did not fight for SALT II <em>because the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan</em>. With new tensions arising between the superpowers, President Carter removed the SALT II from Senate consideration in January 1980. Both SALT I and SALT II, Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, were aimed at curtailing the manufacture of nuclear missiles.

You might be interested in
Why did Jewish people move away from urban areas in Europe between 1100 and 1600? They were being treated poorly by others. They
forsale [732]

Answer: They were being treated poorly by others.

Explanation: In much of Europe during the Middle Ages, Jews were denied citizenship and its rights, barred from holding posts in government and the military, and excluded from membership in guilds and the professions.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was affected by the “Arabization” program in Northern Iraq?
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

(600 Kurdish villages were burned down and around 200,000 Kurds were deported to the other parts of the country.)

7 0
3 years ago
After Jesus' crucifixion, his followers called him "Christ," meaning
snow_tiger [21]
After Jesus' crucifixion, his followers called him <em>Christ, </em>meaning the anointed one. The anointed one is usually transliterated into English (since it is a Jewish word) as Messiah. He is called Christ because it was believed he is the awaited Messiah in Bible. 
6 0
3 years ago
Athenian cities are best know for their production and export of iron weapons and farming tools.
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

the answer to this problem is true

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the roles and qualifications of the office of the President? (Make sure to list all of them and explain).
baherus [9]

Answer:yr

Explanation:

yrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • About how long ago did Jesus of Nazareth live?
    9·1 answer
  • What is NOT a theory about the fall of Zimbabwe?
    8·2 answers
  • My Topic Is James Oglethorpe 2) Now, what thesis can you propose and prove based on your topic?
    9·1 answer
  • (2011-
    15·1 answer
  • “Since your serene Majesty and your lordships request a simple answer, I shall give it, with no strings and no catches. Unless I
    13·2 answers
  • Explain why the Jazz age represented the African American community
    14·1 answer
  • What is the worst thing you can do to a catholic christian
    9·2 answers
  • BLEEEEEEE hhaha BAKOWIEHEJE
    13·2 answers
  • How did the introduction of new weapons fundamentally change how the war was fought? (Short Answer-2-4 sentences)
    10·1 answer
  • Can some one help me with this question plssss
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!