1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
4 years ago
10

President Carter and Soviet premier Leonid Brezhnev signed an agreement known as SALT II. However, President Carter did not push

the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty. Why did President Carter not fight for SALT II?
History
2 answers:
Ira Lisetskai [31]4 years ago
7 0

During a summit meeting in Vienna, President Jimmy Carter and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev sign the SALT-II agreement dealing with limitations and guidelines for nuclear weapons. The treaty, which never formally went into effect, proved to be one of the most controversial U.S.-Soviet agreements of the Cold War.

The SALT-II agreement was the result of many nagging issues left over from the successful SALT-I treaty of 1972. Though the 1972 treaty limited a wide variety of nuclear weapons, many issues remained unresolved. Talks between the United States and the Soviet Union began almost immediately after SALT-I was ratified by both nations in 1972. Those talks failed to achieve any new breakthroughs, however. By 1979, both the United States and Soviet Union were eager to revitalize the process. For the United States, fear that the Soviets were leaping ahead in the arms race was the primary motivator. For the Soviet Union, the increasingly close relationship between America and communist China was a cause for growing concern.

In June 1979, Carter and Brezhnev met in Vienna and signed the SALT-II agreement. The treaty basically established numerical equality between the two nations in terms of nuclear weapons delivery systems. It also limited the number of MIRV missiles (missiles with multiple, independent nuclear warheads). In truth, the treaty did little or nothing to stop, or even substantially slow down, the arms race. Nevertheless, it met with unrelenting criticism in the United States. The treaty was denounced as a “sellout” to the Soviets, one that would leave America virtually defenseless against a whole range of new weapons not mentioned in the agreement. Even supporters of arms control were less than enthusiastic about the treaty, since it did little to actually control arms.

Debate over SALT-II in the U.S. Congress continued for months. In December 1979, however, the Soviets launched an invasion of Afghanistan. The Soviet attack effectively killed any chance of SALT-II being passed, and Carter ensured this by withdrawing the treaty from the Senate in January 1980. SALT-II thus remained signed, but unratified. During the 1980s, both nations agreed to respect the agreement until such time as new arms negotiations could take place.

Minchanka [31]4 years ago
5 0

President Carter did not push the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty, President Carter did not fight for SALT II <em>because the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan</em>. With new tensions arising between the superpowers, President Carter removed the SALT II from Senate consideration in January 1980. Both SALT I and SALT II, Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, were aimed at curtailing the manufacture of nuclear missiles.

You might be interested in
Which U.S. president established the Civilian Conservation Corps, which employed young men to plant trees, make paths and roads
saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

Franklin D. Roosevelt

Explanation:

He did it because in his term there was the great depression. And in order to protect our livestock he planted the same live stock and protected the natural resources so that the Great Depression would not happen again.

5 0
3 years ago
One of the benefits of implementing a marking plan is that it assists in measuring market success. False True
Sphinxa [80]

Answer: Yes this is true

Explanation: Implementing a marketing plan is really helpful in measuring market success.

6 0
2 years ago
How did life on earth begin
fomenos

Precisely how life began on Earth remains unclear. It is believed, however, that life started after the planet had cooled enough for bodies of water to form. Scientists have found fossilized single-celled microorganisms in rocks that date to approximately 3.5 billion years ago. Scientists believe that algae is one of the earliest forms of life on our planet.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.In terms of migration, which of the following is an example of a pull factor?
stiv31 [10]
1) B2) B3) B4) A5) C

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you need to start a industrial revolution?
Savatey [412]
The use of new basic materials.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • at the beginning of the civil war where was there more factories and rail roads ? in the north or the south?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the transcontinental railroad primarily designed to move from west to east in the united states?
    12·2 answers
  • According to “Pool’s Purpose Misunderstood”, how did the long Sunday holiday contribute to the collapse?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the bush administration back the un resolution calling for saddam hussein to withdraw from kuwait?
    9·2 answers
  • How were the protest techniques used by student protesters similar to different from those of the civil rights movement?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the primary reason khrushchev objected to the concept of "enemy of the people" ?
    15·1 answer
  • Which media source will best support paragraphy 4?
    8·1 answer
  • IN YOUR OWN WORDS <br> what do Covenants have to do with Salvation History?
    9·1 answer
  • SOMEONE HELP ME ASAP pls I really need help!
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP I REALLY REALLY NEED HELP I'll literally give someone brainlest if they get the question right
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!