Just subtract 20.35 from 100.8
if your bag weighs 100.8 kg and you scoop out 20.35 kg then weigh your bag it will be 80.45 bc u took out 20.35 kg of the cement to use. hope that explains it
Here are your answer's:
Number three would goes with "no relationship"...…
Number one would goes with "<span>causation</span>".....
Number two goes with "correlation"...…
<u>Correlation is the relationship between more than two things which is why it would go with number to because literacy rates go with the increase of doctors. Causation is like a cause and effect so in this case the cause would be a increase of the population and the effect would be more people who don't have jobs. No relationship would go with number three since how snowfall doesn't have anything to do with personal income. (which is how much a person makes) </u>
Hope this helps!
<span>Put it in the form of y =mx +b, or in this instance, y> mx +b
move the (1/2) x to the right by adding it to both sides of the inequality
(1/3)y>(1/2)x +2
Multiply by 3 on both sides to get y by itself.
y>(3/2) x +6
This is a graph with y intercept of (0,6) and a moderate upward and to the right slope. Because it is > , the line on the graph will NOT be part of the solution.
The easiest way to find the side of the graph that the inequality satisfies is to use (0,0) and see if it works or doesn't work. In the original equation, 0-0>2 does NOT work, so the area where the inequality works is to the up and left of the graph, which should be a dotted line to show that the inequality is greater than only.
The point (6,-2) should work.
Test it. 6*(1/3)-(-2)*(1/2)>0 ; 2-(-1)=3, and 3>2 It does work.
The point (6,2) should not work
Test it. 6 *(1/3)-2(1/2)=2-1 ; 1 is NOT >2, so it does not work.
If the graph goes through the origin, then pick a point near the graph with a small x or y.</span>
