The logical inference a person can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist is:
- <u>He would have shown him how there was no freedom in China twenty years ago</u>
<u />
According to the given question, the narrator says that the American artist is making unnecessary protests about having so little freedom.
This shows an irony that he does not appreciate the freedom he enjoys and feels he lacks freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that the logical inference we can make about the good lesson which he wants to teach the American artist is that he would show him how little freedom there was in China twenty years ago and how he enjoys freedom.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/8369124
The answer is b., due to how the rhythm seems to be more fluidic
Answer:
descriptions of places, description of people, and relevant facts and details.
Explanation:
The last one seems to be correct
If I am reading this correctly, you have been tasked with researching the "impact of perspective on historic events", meaning you will find how different thoughts and belief systems can impact historical events. Essentially, how do personal experiences, biases, beliefs, and/or attitudes affect the path of history?
In the materials, it shows you need a political figure's speech. These can often be found on YouTube or government websites. You will also need to editorials that review the figure's speech. These sources will be used as evidence for the essay component.
Your essay will have an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The introduction should incorporate your findings regarding perspective and its role in the selected speech. The first body paragraph will summarize the speech audio/film, while the second and third paragraphs will review the two selected editorials. The conclusion should evaluate any 'loose ends' between the editorials, in addition to your general ideas on perspective's role in history.
I hope that helps!
