All categories

2 years ago

The purpose of the liberty loan campaign illustrated in the drawing above was to

Business

2 answers:

yKpoI14uk [10]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The correct answer is Finance American involvement in the First World War.

Explanation:

Apart from war bonds, there was another source of financing for the First World War which consisted of borrowing very high amounts in order to be paid in a relatively short period of time. With the bonds, a series of obligations of the states are acquired that must be fulfilled in a period of time and at a determined interest rate.

olasank [31]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

finance American war efforts during World War 1

Explanation:

There were 4 Liberty Bonds issues between 1917 and 1918. These bonds were very important back then since they were used to finance American involvement in World War 1. The interests earned from the first issue were even tax exempt up to $30,000 which was a lot of money back then.

Besides helping the US fight WWI, Liberty Bonds are still important because the law that authorized them is still currently used to authorize all the issuance of US securities. Very few laws have had such a long life span and really with given a lot of use.

You might be interested in

In which career would you typically oversee the creation of materials that communicate a favorable public image of your employer

Darya [45]

Answer:

B) Public Relations Manager

Explanation:

A public relations specialist is someone who creates and maintains a favourable public image for their employer or client. They write material for media releases, plan and direct public relations programs, and raise funds for their organizations.

Hope this helps..please vote with thanks

5 0

2 years ago

If a U.S. firm desires to avoid the risk from exchange rate fluctuations, and it is receiving 100,000 in 90 days, it could:_____

ivolga24 [154]

A 90-day forward-sale purchase contract will help to reduce or eliminate the risk facing the U.S. Firm.

<h3>What is a Forward sale Contract?</h3>

This refers to a special contract between two parties to purchase or sell an asset at an agreed price on a future date.

The fact that the price has been set and agreed upon protects the parties from fluctuations, which in this case, is exchange rate risks.

The correct answer, thus, is A.

See the link below for more about Forward-sale contract:

brainly.com/question/14862085

6 0

1 year ago

a(n) _____ operation does not start processing or assembling products until it receives a customer order.

Scorpion4ik [409]

A Make-to-Order Operations operation does not start processing or assembling products until it receives a customer order.
This type of strategy is used to minimize product abundance that exist in the market. Usually, being done by the company whose products sold under a large price (such as car or boats)

4 0

2 years ago

Which of these is not a result of the federal government spending more than it earns?The choices are: Budget deficits. . Budget

Sveta_85 [38]

Increased taxes are not a result of the federal government spending more than it earns. The correct answer between all the choices given is the last choice. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.

7 0

3 years ago

An agreement between Jim and his 18-year-old daughter, Betty, provides that he will give her $25,000 if she does not marry until

Mariulka [41]

Answer:

No, Jim is not correct.

Explanation:

Betty will win this case.

Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.

Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.

Therefore, Jim is not correct.

4 0

2 years ago