Answer:
He eyed his dad suspiciously.
Wracked with embarrassment and guilt.
Explanation:
Hope that helps! ^_^
Answer:
Today, individuals in particular and society in general are enormously dependent on technology. That is to say, the human being has generated a dependency on all the technological tools available, in such a way that if they were missing, their daily organization would be altered in a transcendent way: today it is practically impossible to carry out a normal life without a car, internet or cell phone. Even minor issues are also demonstrative: practically nobody can explore an unknown place without a GPS, and even almost nobody makes their purchases without having first checked the Amazon or Alibaba web pages to compare prices before going to the store. In this way, it is evident how technology has broken into our lives, making us largely dependent on its advances.
Answer:
The narrator can be a witness or a reteller of events.
The narrator is a character in the story.
Explanation:
A first-person narrative is a point of view where the narrator, who is also a character in the story, tells about themselves or events from their point of view. This kind of narrative can be recognized by the use of the first-person pronouns <em>I </em>or <em>we</em>. The story may be narrated by a first-person protagonist, first-person reteller, first-person witness, or first-person peripheral.
He wanted to convey that indifference is worse than hate or anger. One could be angry at injustice or hate evil, violent acts Indifference is the absence of compassion and implies something worse than outright hate; indifference implies a lack of acknowledgment. Being indifferent to another's suffering is like saying, 'you're suffering is not even worth my consideration.' Wiesel speaks from his experience of the Holocaust, but this could be applied to any situation in history in which the world was indifferent; in which the world willfully refused to acknowledge suffering of others for any number of unjustifiable reasons: 1) out of sight, out of mind, 2) passivity, laziness, 3) an untried feeling of hopelessness ('what could i possibly do?'), 4) selfishness. When Wiesel speaks of indifference he also means ignorance in 3 senses: 1) ignorant as in lacking sensitivity, 2) lacking knowledge and 3) ignoring. The 'perils of indifference' could be described as the 'the terrible outcomes of ignoring atrocities. Apply this to anything today, where suffering is ignored by indifferent people and governments. (i.e., Darfur, Haiti). The peril of indifference would be to allow (allow by ignoring = indifference) an atrocity like the Holocaust to occur again.
