<span>A primary document is something written by a participant or contemporary observer. For example you could look at documents, accounts of battles, memoirs of soldiers/politicians, a newspaper article from the era etc.
A secondary source would be someone writing about the Civil War after the event not having participated or witnessed anything.
</span><span>This was delivered in March 1865 just after he was sworn in - it recaps the reasons why the Union went to war and recommends finishing the job off (the CW had a few weeks still to run at that point, although most people by then knew it was a matter of time, exactly when was still in doubt). It also follows up on the Gettysburg Address of November 1863 where Lincoln recast the CW as a fight to free the slaves and bring about the original concept outlined by the Founding Fathers of freedom and equality.
</span>
i cant give you a link becuz brainly blocks it. Sorry, but i would if i could!
Answer:
1. It Is a clear expression of fake democracy. The term "free election" doesn't entirely make sense in a country where any distinction between the ruling party and the government has been almost completely erased. Syria is considered a unitary republic with a semi-presidential style of government. However, the controlling parties practice a highly authoritarian regime with most of the political power in the AL-Assad family's hands. People doesn't have more option if the want to "live".
2. If I live in that country, I think I feel like a hostage. Elections over there aren't free, and they're certainly not fair. The resulting optics are not democratic enough. They buy the government a minimum of democratic credibility abroad without seriously imperiling its hold on power.
Explanation:
False, at the end of the Third Punic war in 146BC, they re-developed as Roman Carthage which had become a major city of the Roman Empire in the province of Africa. It didn’t BECOME the province, it was a city within it.