Answer: It uses inductive reasoning based on specific examples of people living this way.
Explanation:
Answer:
Either to release stress from school by texting to someone their feelings or what happened through out the day to someone or another could be to talk to people out side school such as their mother for example
Explanation:
hope this helped! :)
Jeremy Simms was a unique boy of his time, he was blind to race.
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
C. However, Ekman warns that empathy can also go terribly wrong.
