As a capitalist during the Industrial Revolution, I feel quite excited about the possibilities of expanding my business and increasing my profit. However, I am aware competition will increase over time.
<h3>How did capitalists feel about the Industrial Revolution?</h3>
In general, the capitalist had:
Positive feelings: The industrial revolution implied people with small businesses could expand them if they had the resources to do it. This brought hope.
Negative feelings: On the other hand, capitalists were aware that competence would increase as everyone would want to expand.
Learn more aabout capitalism in: brainly.com/question/7672602
#SPJ1
Answer:
I would say that yes government should provide health care.
Explanation:
Start off your first paragraph with your opinion and add one reason. An example would be, Government should provide health care because reason 1. Discuss reason 1 in the first paragraph. For the second paragraph start the same way, I think government should provide health care because reason 2. If you have text then include quotes. In one of your paragraphs include a counter claim. Basically say, Some people may say government should not provide health care because (insert reason). Then say, this is not a realistic reason because..... At the end of your first paragraph write a transitional sentence such as, government has many other reasons to provide health care or something along that line. At the end of your second paragraph write a concluding sentence. For example, government should provide health care because reason 1 and reason 2 prove that it would be beneficial. One reason you could use I thought of right away was so that people are able to care more about helping their child, significant other, mom, dad, etc get better than worry about how much money the life saving procedure is going to cost. A reason you could say to not provide health care, is that insurance would most likely fight procedures more and it would be difficult to get treatments because if everyone can now get procedures they need for free, some people may not be accepted because they are not in as dire of circumstances. Overall, a general rule of thumb I use is pick the side that is easiest to support not what you necessarily agree with.
To emphasize that the United States was never completely isolationist nor will it ever be all-powerful.
A foreign character includes a nonresident alien individual, foreign corporation, foreign partnership, overseas trust, overseas property, and another man or woman that isn't the US. person. it is also an overseas branch of the US. monetary organization if the overseas department is a qualified intermediary. A foreigner can be used extra generally to intend someone from outside a person's community or organization.
Foreign is an appropriate phrase when used to explain regulations, however, regarding a person as overseas or a foreigner leaves a horrific flavor in quite a few people's mouths. you like to be called overseas all people known through that time period are mechanically labeled as different someone that doesn't belong. The overseas-born populace consists of everyone who is not a U.S. citizen at the beginning, which includes people who become U.S. residents via naturalization. The native-born populace includes anybody who's a U.S. citizen at birth.
Learn more about The illusion here:-brainly.com/question/17668900
#SPJ9
