The answer is a. Sad mad had cap lad,,,,,from lomb com
Answer:The Constitution of the United States said little about religion. ... the Constitution did not prohibit the kind of state-supported religion that had flourished ... alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand. ... potential critics who might claim religious discrimination in eligibility for public office.
Explanation:
The Constitution of the United States said little about religion. ... the Constitution did not prohibit the kind of state-supported religion that had flourished ... alone, which can establish the Principles upon which Freedom can securely stand. ... potential critics who might claim religious discrimination in eligibility for public office.
Answer:
Washington's Farewell Address
Explanation:
Washington's Farewell Address was just that, a farewell address given by outgoing first President George Washington in which he warned of the dangers that faced America ahead.
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
