Answer: A large number of volunteers joined to collect trash from the artist's sculpture, a great interest of society in wanting to see the sculptures.
Explanation:
Angela Pozzi is an artist who found her inspiration in the trash and in an original, artistic way she pointed out the problems of environmental pollution. The project started back in 2010 and is still relevant today. Pozzi made sculptures that look massive from debris from the sea and the beaches. For the most part, the artist depicts living creatures inhabiting the sea with sculptures, and how human activity threatens the living environment. The audience was enthusiastic about the move. Pozzi organized a workshop where volunteers bring trash so they can make their sculpture. Significant public interest was also present. Part of the itinerary came to various parts of the United States, and the attendance was enormous. Pozzi pointed out that the reactions were extremely emotional and that the setting had a high impact on people's consciousness.
Answer:
Hun, you'll need to put the sentences up so we can know which to choose from.
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe it is all of the above
Explanation:
She argues with her husband (man v man), her domestic entrapment (man v society), and her pursuing madness (man v self).
Answer:Opinion, Fact and Opinion, Fact
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. The author of passage 1 believes fish farming is beneficial to the environment, while the author of Passage 2 believes fish farming is not the solution to overfishing
Explanation:
The two passages provide a different about fish farming, which is the practice that involves raising fish rather than capturing them in their natural habitat. In the case of the passage 1, the author proposes fish farming is beneficial because this stops the problem of overfishing, this can be seen in "Fish farming helps humans continue to consume fish while protecting valuable marine resources" that shows fish farming is the way to protect the environment and the populations of fish while benefitting humans.
On the opposite, the author of passage 2 exposes the negative effects of fish farming and in this way shows this is not a solution. This can be seen in "one of the major problems with fish farming is water supply contamination" or in "it also causes destructions to habits" that supports the idea fishing farming does not solve the problems caused by overfishing.
