The Delaware Indians were the first inhabitants of the area that is now New Jersey. Beginning at least 10,000 years ago, they inhabited this area. The number of Delaware Indians in the region ranged from 8,000 to 20,000 when the first European settlers arrived. "Original people" or "genuine people" are what their name denotes. They used an Algonquian tongue.
- The Delaware Indians did not behave as a cohesive tribe while being regarded as one. Instead, they resided in small towns where the majority of the residents were relatives. During the day, the guys would go hunting or fishing. They might go hunting in the woods or looking for clams off the Jersey shore depending on the time of year. The gardens were tended to by women. Squash, beans, sweet potatoes, and corn were all grown there.
- Giovanni di Verrazano was the first European to explore New Jersey, sometime around 1524. He anchored off Sandy Hook after sailing close to the shore. Following Henry Hudson's passage into Newark Bay in 1609, New Jersey's colonial history began. Despite being British, Hudson worked for the Netherlands and claimed the territory on their behalf. The name of it was New Netherlands.
- Where the current municipalities of Hoboken and Jersey City are situated, little trading colonies arose. The earliest Europeans to settle in New Jersey were the Dutch, the Swedes, and the Finns. The first permanent European settlement in New Jersey was Bergen, which was established in 1660.
- When the British acquired control of the territory and incorporated it to their colonies in 1664, the Dutch lost New Netherlands. They divided the land in half and granted two owners power over each half: Lord John Berkley and Sir George Carteret, who were in charge of the east side (who was in charge of the west side). After the Isle of Jersey in the English Channel, the region was given the official name New Jersey. The Isle of Jersey has been governed by Carteret.
To learn more about New Jersey visit:brainly.com/question/3002798
#SPJ9
I believe, the answer is: "representation to all social classes"
because, in history we don't usually( mostly) find government providing equal rights or maintaining a strict law.. and if it had been like that, then such governments wouldn't hav become THE PAST
and politics can never b separated from religion, unless the nation is atheist
Answer:
See below.
Explanation:
One is determined by the other. Civic action, from the 50's through the 60's, which was often meant with acts of extreme violence, led to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. So they are linked and one is dependent on the other.
Given that it is very difficult to isolate any one as being more or less effective than another. Civil rights action was targeted to be as effective as possible economically and politically. Leaders such as Martin Luther King emphasized the need for peaceful means of protest. So pressure group activity such as marches, demonstrations and lobbying politicians was combined with economic boycotts which hit the white economy in the south.
The greater the media coverage and outrage at the continued abuse of civil rights then the greater the pressure on the federal government to pass appropriate legislation. So how successful ahs this legislation been?
The Civil Rights Act in 1964 was followed by the Voting Rights Act in 1965, outlawing discriminatory practices in voting which was still commonplace in the south.
Passing legislation is one thing but making it effective is another. Minority groups have had to continue to fight in the courts to overcome discrimination and harassment. In 2000 the Presidential election came down to a few voting wards in Florida. Those primarily African-American suffered disenfranchisement, Chad machines that didn't work and road blocks. This, in effect, put Bush Jnr in the White House.
American imperialism is the term for a policy aimed at extending the political, economic, and cultural control of the United States government over areas beyond its boundaries. Depending on the commentator, it may include military conquest, gunboat diplomacy, unequal treaties, subsidization of preferred factions, economic penetration through private companies followed by intervention when those interests are threatened, or regime change.
