Arguments in favour of a minimum wage mostly hang on the idea that firms have a responsibility to ensure that their workers earn enough to live on. If a firm can’t pay its workers enough to live on, then it isn’t a viable business, because it is dependent on wage subsidies. Of course “enough to live on” depends where you live: the cost of living in London is considerably higher than it is in, say, Newcastle, so a minimum wage that would give a reasonable standard of living in Newcastle is starvation level in London. The campaign for a voluntary Living Wage tries to persuade firms to pay above the current UK minimum wage, which is perceived as being below the real cost of living.
The answer is redemption. In United States history, the Redeemers were a political alliance in the Southern United States during the Reconstruction Era that trailed the Civil War. Redeemers were the southern wing of the Bourbon Democrats, the traditional, pro-business faction in the Democratic Party, who shadowed a policy of Redemption, seeking to exile the Radical Republicans, a coalition of freedmen, "carpetbaggers", and "scalawags". They normally were led by the rich landowners, businessmen and professionals, and dominated Southern politics in most parts from the 1870s to 1910.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice "internal violence"
<span>Major Gideon Gwaza Orkar was a Nigerian military officer who staged a violent coup against the government of General Ibrahim Babangida on April 22, 1990.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
I think it is peoples democratic dictatorship
If texas was to do annexation it would effect the slave to no slave state ratio
