Answer:
what is your question I can help you
The sentence that can be removed <u>without affecting the explanation</u> is "<em>In the 1800s, the United States was still a very young nation, trying to solidify its identity</em>."
The reason this sentence can be removed is that it does not offer any necessary information to the explanation. The passage is about how technology leads to bigger cities. This information is conveyed just as efficiently without the need for the first sentence.
Rather than serving to offer information, the first sentence in the passage serves as a sort of <u>introduction</u> to the text. The very next sentence can just as easily serve as an intro to the passage while providing context for the development of early technology that led to the industrial revolution.
For these reasons, the sentence "<em>In the 1800s, the United States was still a very young nation, trying to solidify its identity</em>." can easily be removed from the passage <u>without affecting</u> the explanation.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/816588?referrer=searchResults
I think you forgot to give the choices along with the question. i am answering the question based on my knowledge and research. "The beliefs of the two groups directly opposed each other" is the statement that best describes therelationship between Enlightenment thinking and the thinking of Edwards's followers.
Tybalt, a Capulet, says this to Benvolio, a Montague, in act 1, scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet. The insult begins a brawl between the two families.
Answer:
Jul ian will not look at August.
Explanation:
I got it correct!
Apologies for the space in Jul ian, it thinks the name is a swear word. <3
