Hello,
The answer should be option D "<span>It encourages companies to produce more of the product".
Reason:
A saturated market is a product that is distributed which means companies would have to make more of that product in order to make money, and to have more consumers buy their products. The answer is not option A because the consumer will demand more of the product but not to be higher. Its not option B because the product is being distributed among people but not different consumers. Its also not option C because its not against other markets. Therefore the answer is option D.
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!
Hope this helps!
~Nonportrit </span>
Answer: a
Explanation:
The interest rate is the amount a lender charges for the use of assets expressed as a percentage of the principal. The interest rate is a rate of return that lenders demand for the ability to borrow their money. A loan that is considered high risk will have a higher interest rate. Interest rates are prices for loanable funds prices of funds invested, lent out or borrowed for various periods of time.
The supplier or lender of funds normally wants to earn an income and the user or borrower will generally be prepared to pay for the right to use the accumulated funds.
Interest rates apply to most lending or borrowing transactions. Individuals borrow money to purchase homes, fund projects, launch or fund businesses, or pay for college tuition.
Answer:
A bond portfolio and a stock portfolio both provided an unrealized pretax return of 8% to a taxable investor. If the stocks paid no dividends, we know that the ________.
The after-tax return of the stock portfolio was higher than the after-tax return of the bond portfolio.
Explanation:
The returns from the bond portfolio are taxed at the corporate rate while returns from stock investments are taxed at a lower rate. It is well-known that the risks from stock are higher than the risks from bonds. As a result, the stock investments always attract higher returns and less tax, as the investor can postpone the tax for a longer term. Again, stock investments can be for the long-term unlike bonds that have defined periods.
Answer:
$15 million
Explanation:
The three investors' total investments would add up to 100% or 1.
The first two invested in the ration of 2:3
It means ;
Investor 1: 2/5
Investor 2: 3/5
If investor 3 invested twice as investor 1 and 2, then we can deduce that he invested ( 2/5 + 3/5) x 2
the new denominator is 10, meaning
Investor 1 had 2/10,
investor 2 had 3/10
investor 3 had 5/10
If total investments were $30 million, then the highest investor invested
5/10 x $30million
=0.5 x $30 million
=$15 million
<u>Answer:</u>
On the off chance that you <em>kick the bucket</em> during the term, a passing advantage is paid out. On the off chance that you don't pass on during the term, the approach ends toward the finish of the term.
A noteworthy advantage of this sort of approach is that the excellent cash come back to you is <em>totally tax-exempt,</em> as it isn't viewed as salary yet just a discount of premiums.
As you're looking into term <em>life coverage approach choices,</em> you may go over the expression yearly sustainable premium.
Be that as it may, for an every year <em>sustainable premium term approach</em>, the top notch will build every year. After some time it's conceivable to pay more in premiums than what might have been paid for a <em>level premium term approach.</em>
