Hi! :D i think the answer is 3. because i alr knew what house raising was so i just chose the answer that was closest to it! Hopefully i get brainliest 0.0
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The statement best shows her role in the New Kingdom is the following:
"Hatshepsut became the first female pharaoh to rule Egypt."
After the death of Pharaoh Thutmose II, the pharaoh's chief wife, Hatshepsut, served as regent to young Thutmose III. She later took over full control and appointed herself as the pharaoh.
Hatshepsut, Tuthmosis III, Amenhotep III, and Tutankhamun ruled Egypt during the New Kingdom.
These ancient Egyptian Pharaohs ruled in what historians call the 18th Dynasty of Egypt. This dynasty started in 1549 BC and ended in 1292 BC, and is considered to be a period of great accomplishments for the Egyptians and exerted so much power in the Nile River region. Its importance was so big at the time that some historians have named this period the Thutmosid era. During this dynasty, Egypt was ruled by two women Pharaohs: Nefemeferuaten and Hatshepsut. Both Pharaohs had a great deal of success in a time where only men used to govern the lands.
It is necessary to practice Self-regulation to sustain a person's convictions in the face of adversity or an unsupportive organization
<h3>What is
Self-regulation?</h3>
A Self-regulation refers to individual's ability to understand and manage their own behavior and reactions even in time of adversity.
In conclusion, it will be necessary to practice Self-regulation to sustain a person's convictions in the face of adversity or an unsupportive organization
Read more about Self-regulation
<em>brainly.com/question/2413166</em>
Answer:
Paul's mother is all about appearances. She likes the big house with the perfect lawn. Paul is not interested in superficial appearances. Paul is loyal to the people he likes. they are both overprotective people.
Explanation:
Well, before you start, you need to choose a side. If you are confused on the phrasing, it is simply asking:
Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be able to think of the law differently during a case to fit with current views?
After that, start thinking of why.
Yes, they should, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to change as societal views changed.
No, they shouldn't, just because societal views are changing, what we need for our country to run smoothly is the same as it has been,
Hope I could help!
