The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed the people to vote if wanted to allow slavery in those states and this act served to appeal the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery in the north. This act was also said to be a failure because it was made to end the conflict over slavery, but resulted in Kansas becoming a "battleground over slavery."
William McKinley is the 25th
Worcester v. Georgia, was a case in which the United States Supreme CourtvacCourt vacated eviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from<span> the state was unconstitutional.
So I believe the best answer would be B. </span><span>the Cherokee Nation could refuse to sign treaties.</span>
The renaissance was an age where people in Europe were knowledge had spread out more. Plus, boats were better developed so that they can sail through rough sea weather. Products such as paper were created to produce books and newspapers to also spread knowledge. Though the wealthy were the only one's who can afford books and other productions of paper, Schools were also opened so people's education can improve.
The Stamp Act impacted more people in the colonies and hurt the people economically whereas the Sugar Act was not hurting business in the colonies. Merchants in New England were actually able to make more money off of the act.
The Sugar Act place a tax on sugar and molasses as well as attempting to end the smuggling trade taking place with the Dutch and French. Though these products were more expensive it actually helped many merchants make more money without the competition of other countries.
The Stamp Act required a tax on all government stamps. The stamps were necessary for all contracts and official government documents. Those involved in trade needed more stamps than others and therefore greatly protested the added tax. The Stamp Act was so protested that violence was used against the stamp collectors and led to the act being repealed a year after passage.