As a result of the attack by Natives on Oñate's men at Acoma,<u> </u><u>a. 10 men, </u><u>including</u><u> Oñate's nephew</u><u>, were </u><u>killed</u><u>.</u>
In 1598, an incident occurred where:
- The Spanish went to meet a Native chief.
- The Spanish engaged violently with the Natives.
- The Natives massacred all 12 Spanish soldiers.
The incident occurred in Acoma and infuriated Oñate such that in the following year, the Spanish attacked Acoma and slaughtered around 800 Natives.
In conclusion, option A is correct.
Find out more about the Juan de Oñate at brainly.com/question/7554073.
The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
Answer:
Aimed at socialists, pacifists and other anti-war activists, the Sedition Act imposed harsh penalties on anyone found guilty of making false statements that interfered with the prosecution of the war; insulting or abusing the U.S. government, the flag, the Constitution or the military; agitating against the production
