1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
deff fn [24]
4 years ago
15

PLZZZ HELP MEEE LOLOLOL

History
2 answers:
Lera25 [3.4K]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

woah

Explanation:

yawa3891 [41]4 years ago
4 0

<span><span>IT IS an awful lot of rubbish. Since 1960 the amount of municipal waste being collected in America has nearly tripled, reaching 245m tonnes in 2005. According to European Union statistics, the amount of municipal waste produced in western Europe increased by 23% between 1995 and 2003, to reach 577kg per person. (So much for the plan to reduce waste per person to 300kg by 2000.) As the volume of waste has increased, so have recycling efforts. In 1980 America recycled only 9.6% of its municipal rubbish; today the rate stands at 32%. A similar trend can be seen in Europe, where some countries, such as Austria and the Netherlands, now recycle 60% or more of their municipal waste. Britain's recycling rate, at 27%, is low, but it is improving fast, having nearly doubled in the past three years.Even so, when a city introduces a kerbside recycling programme, the sight of all those recycling lorries trundling around can raise doubts about whether the collection and transportation of waste materials requires more energy than it saves. We are constantly being asked: Is recycling worth doing on environmental grounds? says Julian Parfitt, principal analyst at Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP), a non-profit British company that encourages recycling and develops markets for recycled materials.Studies that look at the entire life cycle of a particular material can shed light on this question in a particular case, but WRAP decided to take a broader look. It asked the Technical University of Denmark and the Danish Topic Centre on Waste to conduct a review of 55 life-cycle analyses, all of which were selected because of their rigorous methodology. The researchers then looked at more than 200 scenarios, comparing the impact of recycling with that of burying or burning particular types of waste material. They found that in 83% of all scenarios that included recycling, it was indeed better for the environment.Based on this study, WRAP calculated that Britain's recycling efforts reduce its carbon-dioxide emissions by 10m-15m tonnes per year. That is equivalent to a 10% reduction in Britain's annual carbon-dioxide emissions from transport, or roughly equivalent to taking 3.5m cars off the roads. Similarly, America's Environmental Protection Agency estimates that recycling reduced the country's carbon emissions by 49m tonnes in 2005.Recycling has many other benefits, too. It conserves natural resources. It also reduces the amount of waste that is buried or burnt, hardly ideal ways to get rid of the stuff. (Landfills take up valuable space and emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas; and although incinerators are not as polluting as they once were, they still produce noxious emissions, so people dislike having them around.) But perhaps the most valuable benefit of recycling is the saving in energy and the reduction in greenhouse gases and pollution that result when scrap materials are substituted for virgin feedstock. If you can use recycled materials, you don't have to mine ores, cut trees and drill for oil as much,says Jeffrey Morris of Sound Resource Management, a consulting firm based in Olympia, Washington.Extracting metals from ore, in particular, is extremely energy-intensive. Recycling aluminium, for example, can reduce energy consumption by as much as 95%. Savings for other materials are lower but still substantial: about 70% for plastics, 60% for steel, 40% for paper and 30% for glass. Recycling also reduces emissions of pollutants that can cause smog, acid rain and the contamination of waterways.</span></span>
You might be interested in
A travel agent arranges a vacation at Disney World for the Smith family that includes airfare, lodging, and dinner
Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

Tourism and Restaurant career cluster.

Explanation:

Tourism which is an age long profession engaged by many companies tries to ensure that, the relics of the ancient civilizations are shown to the tourist inorder to bring the experience of those times closer to them.

<em>Most times, the people who engages in such commonly known as travel agent arranges for touristic  visitations only with the tourist left to cater for his or lodging (accomodation) and feeding while at that particular place. However, in a situation whereby the airfare from the tourist's place of residence to the tourist's country of visit, the lodging and feeding is inculcated into the tourist package, such arragement is mostly done to ease the stress of the tourists.</em>

<em> The industries that offer such complete package is collectively known as Tourism and Restaurant career cluster. The travel agent enters into partnership with the various sectors inorder to achieve this vacation arragement.</em>

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
True or false the Egyptian we're the only civilization to build pyramids
babymother [125]
The answer is false
Alright?
4 0
3 years ago
All of the following are TRUE about Mission San Juan Bautista EXCEPT: a. It was located along the Rio Grande. b. It was founded
hammer [34]

d. It was the gateway for expeditions into the interior of Texas.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which group was responsible for determining the borders of african colonies and later countries?
solmaris [256]

Answer:

The correct answer is D. The European Imperial Powers were who determined the borders of African colonies and later countries.

Explanation:

The European Imperial Powers determined the African borders at the Berlin Conference.

The Berlin Conference took place in Berlin from November 15, 1884 to February 26, 1885, marking the European collaboration in the partition and territorial division of Africa. Germany, Austria, Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, Spain, France, Great Britain, Italy, Norway, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia and the United States participated in it. The declared objective was to "regulate the freedom of trade in the Congo and Niger basins, as well as new occupations of territories on the west coast of Africa."

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of Roosevelt's three Cs—consumer protections, control of corporation, or conservations—do you think has had the most lasti
4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

conservations

Explanation:

conservations bc we still have them for trees as well as national forests

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did president franklin roosevelt respond to adolf hitler's attack on the soviet union in june 1941?
    12·1 answer
  • Which area of the country became the center of the american industrial revolution?
    10·1 answer
  • What two sources guided most Europeans’ thinking about the natural world during the Middle Ages?
    15·1 answer
  • Ww2 in 1944 in Europe
    15·2 answers
  • Churchill received the nobel prize for literature in 1953. true false
    5·1 answer
  • How old is the current president
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a valid conclusion that can be drawn from the statement, “Resources like time, money, and energy are s
    7·1 answer
  • How did the US governments actions both unite and divide americans during WW1?​
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these steps is part of a person’s right to due process?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the Installment plan?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!