All the options are correct.
As we know before Missouri Compromise of 1820, there were 11 free states and 11 save states and so there was a balance of power between North and South. The admission of Missouri as a slave state would result the imbalance. So we see Henry Clay, a congressman came with Missouri Compromise which provided for admission of Missouri as a slave state along with Maine as a free state in order to maintain the balance of power. It also prohibited slavery in the north of 36*30 parallel, excluding Missouri. So ultimately resolved the heated issue of the time in the Senate over slave states and free states. As it was a controversial act, it was later declared unconstitutional and was repealed by Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
Answer:
i think B but i may be wrong (sorry if its incorrect)
Explanation:
The best and most correct answers among the choices provided by the question are the first choice or number 1, and the fourth choice or number 4.
Feudalism is a system of cooperation among peoples which was basically an exchange of gold for protection and a<span> knight may serve a vassal in exchange for land are statements that are not true.</span>
I hope my answers has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
The invading army reached the outskirts of Rome, which had been left totally undefended. In 410 C.E., the Visigoths, led by Alaric, breached the walls of Rome and sacked the capital of the Roman Empire.
The Visigoths looted, burned, and pillaged their way through the city, leaving a wake of destruction wherever they went. The plundering continued for three days. For the first time in nearly a millennium, the city of Rome was in the hands of someone other than the Romans. This was the first time that the city of Rome was sacked, but by no means the las
Answer:
* Leaders of the established 1966 military coup, including armed force officials Colonel E.K. Kotoka, Major A.A. Afrifa, Lieutenant General (resigned) J.A. Ankra, and Police Controller General J.W.K. Harlley, legitimized their takeover by charging that the CPP organization was harsh and degenerate. They were similarly upset by Kwame Nkrumah's forceful contribution in African legislative issues and by his conviction that Ghanaian soldiers could be sent anyplace in Africa to battle alleged freedom wars, despite the fact that they never did as such.
* Most importantly, they highlighted the nonappearance of vote based practices in the country a circumstance they guaranteed had influenced the confidence of the military. As indicated by Broad Kotoka, the military coup of 1966 was a patriot one since it freed the country from Nkrumah's tyranny an announcement that was upheld by Alex Quaison Sackey, Nkrumah's previous priest of international concerns.
Explanation:
Regardless of the huge political changes that were achieved by the topple of Kwame Nkrumah, numerous issues remained. For instance, the fundamental ethnic and provincial divisions inside the general public must be tended to. The clear soul of public solidarity that appeared to have created during the Nkrumah years ended up having brought about part from his coercive powers just as from his allure.
As an outcome, progressive new pioneers confronted the issue of producing dissimilar individual, ethnic, and sectional interests into a country with shared character and interests. The financial weights, exasperated by what some depicted as past lavishness, injured every future government's capacity to cultivate the fast advancement expected to fulfill even negligible mainstream requests for a superior life. The dread of a resurgence of an excessively solid focal position kept on ruling the sacred plan and to infest the considering many taught, politically disapproved of Ghanaian s. Others, in any case, felt that a solid government was basic.
