He was a leading philanthropist in the steel making industry, and eventually became a superintendent of the Pennsylvania Railroad.
Answer:
Three reasons why the Mongols were great at winning battles
:
1. Age.
2. Horse domain.
3. Training.
Explanation:
- Age: The Mongols learned how to ride at a very young age this was the base of their army strength as their most powerful tactics were based on cavalry.
- Horse domain: The Mongols can use and Bow and Arrow while riding the horse that makes a huge difference at the time because the cavalry could swiftly advance to the front with little warning, and attack the enemy with a hail of arrows.
- Training: The Mongols trained almost any possible war scenario.
Along with this the Mongols had very fierce combat engagement usually swiping out the entire population of the territory in dispute creating a long lasting psychological effect.
For their way of living before, the early humans cannot dwell in permanent homes. Thus, the answer to this question is letter C. This is because it was essential for them to move from one place to another because they were just dependent on the natural abundance of the source of food in a certain area.
Answer:
live in the U.S. for 5 years > understand the fundamental of U.S. history and government > swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution
Explanation:
According to ucis.gov, to become an American citizen, you must have first lived in the U.S. for at least three or five years, be of 18 years of age prior to filing the document of citizenship, be able to read, write, and speak English, have a knowledge of U.S. history and government, and swear the Oath of Allegiance. Out of the answers you have provided, "<em>live in the U.S. for 5 years > understand the fundamental of U.S. history and government > swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution</em>" seems to compose of the most relevant steps <u>in order</u> to become a naturalized citizen.
A provisions of the Us neutrality act of 1935 : prohibited the sale of arms to any belligerent nations
The act of helping in weapon supply can be deemed as an act of favouritsm and couldn't be considered as neutral
Hope this helps!
