1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kkurt [141]
3 years ago
13

As the Great Depression began in 1929, and millions of Americans found themselves in a terrible economic position, President Her

bert Hoover was reluctant to involve the government in directly helping people. This decision helped lead to his loss in the presidential election of 1932. Put yourself in Hoover’s shoes—what reasons would he have for being opposed to large-scale government involvement in the economic lives of Americans? What reasons could be given for the government getting involved?
History
2 answers:
Stella [2.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Hebert Hoover was President of the United States from 1929 to 1933, after very prosperous years. Unfortunately, eight months into his presidency in 1929, there was a downturn in the economy known as the “Great Depression” which started with the stock market crash when millions of shares were sold for much less than their worth.  

Because of the bad economy, federal government received less money in tax revenues and It was spending more money. In the first few years after the depression started, Hoover did not increase federal intervention because he thought that government intervention meant stepping towards socialism. He was inclined to give indirect help to banks or local projects but refused to use federal money to aid citizens. He felt that direct aid would weaken the morale and would seem to help in the short term but would be ruinous in the long run. Socialist institutions would devastate the country’s foundations. Nevertheless, he believed that by boosting agricultural production and subsidizing farming the economy would improve creating new jobs. However, foreign international trade was not adjusted accordingly and the surplus production flooded the economy. As a result agricultural prices went down worsening the depression which was by hereinafter called the “Great” Depression. International trade policies would have played an important role in saving the economy, but he increased the tariffs (taxes to foreign goods) leaving little room for negotiating with foreign countries the interchange of products at low prices.  

Moreover he believed that using government power was not the thing to do and that by keeping high wages, the citizens spending capacity would help the economy but it actually sunk the companies in deeper crisis.    

What reasons could be given for the government getting involved?

Hoover, however, decided at the end of his presidency that a drastic action was needed and he opted for “the Hoover New Deal” which included lending tax money to firms, banks and other institutions to reconstruct their finances;  giving direct loans to state governments for relieving the unemployed and other timid federal intervention.

In fact later aggressive government intervention pulled the country out of depression. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed a set of New Deals which were a set of domestic policies that dramatically expanded the federal government’s role in the economy in response to the Great Depression. The New Deal created a range of federal government programs that sought to offer economic relief to the victims, control private industry, and grow the economy. The New Deal is often recalled as the “Three Rs”: Relief (for the unemployed); Recovery (for the USA economy through federal spending and job creation), and Reform (by regulatory legislation and the creation of new social welfare programs). This experience shows that federal intervention can and will in fact help improve a country's economy and will not necessarily step towards social systems but can strengthen capitalist structures.  


MAVERICK [17]3 years ago
5 0

Opposed to government involvement:

America had always been an individualistic nation—government handouts would take away from that.

Hoover believed that the economy would recover on its own.


For government involvement:

Private businesses would not hire people in bad times—government (since it didn’t need to make a profit) could and should get people working and help them out.

Americans were suffering and the national government was the only entity capable of handling such a large problem.

You might be interested in
Do you think the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany? Explain. How would you have changed it? Your response MUST be at
andrezito [222]

Answer:

Why was it so hard to make peace? ... The terms of the Treaty of Versailles were announced in June 1919. ... They complained bitterly, but the Allies did not take any notice of their complaints. Germany had very little choice but to sign the Treaty. The main ... Other historians believe the Treaty was a disastrous half measure.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
How did the us gain Hawaii
pickupchik [31]
In the year of 1893, there was a group of sugar planters and expatriates supported by a division of the us. Marines deposed Queen Liliuokalani, the last reigning monarch of Hawaii. One year later, the Republic of Hawaii was established as a us protectorate with Hawaiian-born Sanford B Dole as president.
8 0
3 years ago
What set in motion the events that led to the Great War?
Nady [450]
<span>The assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand of Austro-Hungary and his wife in Sarayevo on June 1914</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Your local government is debating the problem of plastic waste, especially the lightweight plastic bags used by supermarkets and
Mumz [18]

Answer:

Base on my opinion, the answer is not their, even the bussiness owners is asking to double the prices for a change, would they really do that after? You know that government is more powerful, the government is the law, rather than them,.... The government will decide for the good economic results.

6 0
2 years ago
George H.W. Bush was unable to keep which one of his political promises? He promised the United States would not go to war while
Ludmilka [50]
He said he would not raise taxes
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write a paragraph identifying the system that is the subject of chief justice of comments and explaining his ideas about how the
    15·2 answers
  • At work some people make things difficult for you on purpose agree or disagree
    5·2 answers
  • Which agreement gave the united states complete control of the oregon territory?
    9·1 answer
  • During the 1945 conference in Potsdam,
    6·2 answers
  • What type of essay supports a specific claim or idea?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a key cause of world war 2
    13·1 answer
  • Which economic development contributed to the Great Depression?
    15·2 answers
  • What problems did the Dutch, Swedish,<br> and English experience?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of the influence of corporate power on politics in the decades following
    15·1 answer
  • Before the Renaissance, an early advocate of the study of classical texts was
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!