1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kkurt [141]
3 years ago
13

As the Great Depression began in 1929, and millions of Americans found themselves in a terrible economic position, President Her

bert Hoover was reluctant to involve the government in directly helping people. This decision helped lead to his loss in the presidential election of 1932. Put yourself in Hoover’s shoes—what reasons would he have for being opposed to large-scale government involvement in the economic lives of Americans? What reasons could be given for the government getting involved?
History
2 answers:
Stella [2.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Hebert Hoover was President of the United States from 1929 to 1933, after very prosperous years. Unfortunately, eight months into his presidency in 1929, there was a downturn in the economy known as the “Great Depression” which started with the stock market crash when millions of shares were sold for much less than their worth.  

Because of the bad economy, federal government received less money in tax revenues and It was spending more money. In the first few years after the depression started, Hoover did not increase federal intervention because he thought that government intervention meant stepping towards socialism. He was inclined to give indirect help to banks or local projects but refused to use federal money to aid citizens. He felt that direct aid would weaken the morale and would seem to help in the short term but would be ruinous in the long run. Socialist institutions would devastate the country’s foundations. Nevertheless, he believed that by boosting agricultural production and subsidizing farming the economy would improve creating new jobs. However, foreign international trade was not adjusted accordingly and the surplus production flooded the economy. As a result agricultural prices went down worsening the depression which was by hereinafter called the “Great” Depression. International trade policies would have played an important role in saving the economy, but he increased the tariffs (taxes to foreign goods) leaving little room for negotiating with foreign countries the interchange of products at low prices.  

Moreover he believed that using government power was not the thing to do and that by keeping high wages, the citizens spending capacity would help the economy but it actually sunk the companies in deeper crisis.    

What reasons could be given for the government getting involved?

Hoover, however, decided at the end of his presidency that a drastic action was needed and he opted for “the Hoover New Deal” which included lending tax money to firms, banks and other institutions to reconstruct their finances;  giving direct loans to state governments for relieving the unemployed and other timid federal intervention.

In fact later aggressive government intervention pulled the country out of depression. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed a set of New Deals which were a set of domestic policies that dramatically expanded the federal government’s role in the economy in response to the Great Depression. The New Deal created a range of federal government programs that sought to offer economic relief to the victims, control private industry, and grow the economy. The New Deal is often recalled as the “Three Rs”: Relief (for the unemployed); Recovery (for the USA economy through federal spending and job creation), and Reform (by regulatory legislation and the creation of new social welfare programs). This experience shows that federal intervention can and will in fact help improve a country's economy and will not necessarily step towards social systems but can strengthen capitalist structures.  


MAVERICK [17]3 years ago
5 0

Opposed to government involvement:

America had always been an individualistic nation—government handouts would take away from that.

Hoover believed that the economy would recover on its own.


For government involvement:

Private businesses would not hire people in bad times—government (since it didn’t need to make a profit) could and should get people working and help them out.

Americans were suffering and the national government was the only entity capable of handling such a large problem.

You might be interested in
What are some features belong to the maya and Aztec.
artcher [175]
Both the Maya and Aztec followed polytheistic beliefs. They both served many Supreme Being like the goddesses or gods along their own rite and religion. Both the Maya and Aztec practiced agriculture on a large scale.
5 0
3 years ago
Why did the power of the emperors weaken during the A.D. 800s?
kramer

Many emperors were children weaken the power of the emperors during the A.D. 800s

<u>Explanation:</u>

During the A.D. 800s, the emperor’s power abated. After a time of powerful emperors, several weak emperors occurred to the throne. Many of these emperors were still only children, and court administrators known as regents had to administer for them. A regent is a personality who rules for an emperor who is too childlike or too sick to rule. When the emperors grew up, however, the regents declined to give up their power.  

Most regents came from a group called the Fujiwara. Under the Fujiwara, Japan’s emperors were acknowledged, but they no extended had real power. Rather of the ruling, these emperors spent time studying Buddhism or writing poetry in their palace at Heian.

5 0
4 years ago
Which of the following was not true concerning the First Estate in France?
lilavasa [31]
I believe your answer is <span>C. It did not pay taxes. I hope I could help! :D

Have a great rest of the day.


</span>
4 0
4 years ago
The impact of the second industrial revolution on the trans-mississippi west was:
tresset_1 [31]
The acceleration of factory production and increased activity in the mining and railroad industry
7 0
4 years ago
Which empire established colonies along there trade routes in Spain, Egypt,Italy and Greece 1. Sumerian empire 2. Phoenician emp
horsena [70]
Both the Phoenicians and the Greeks established trade routes throughout the Mediterranean. The <span>Phoenician Empire was made up of both Greek and Phoenician people, so I would select that if two answers aren't allowed.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why according to this document were the Americans justified in fighting the British
    5·2 answers
  • An elected leader in a parliamentary democracy is called a _____.
    15·1 answer
  • How do political parties in the United States reinforce the democratic values we hold as a country
    5·1 answer
  • URGENT PLEASE HELP ME:(
    14·2 answers
  • Page<br>Do<br>o what were the problems of<br>people in the primitiveage?​
    6·1 answer
  • How did the civil war affect Northern and Southern society?
    14·2 answers
  • We should respect all tje culture give your opinion for this statementò​
    10·2 answers
  • What contributed to the assasination of franz ferdinand
    8·1 answer
  • What was the result of the berlin conference in great britain
    7·1 answer
  • In what ways did President Reagan's position on the size of government differ from President Carter's?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!