Answer:
ya moo la since lata Lee mama
Answer:
They did drastically.
Explanation:
The Declaration of Independence wasn't really framework for a solid government. In fact, immediately after the declaration was penned, it was generally assumed that the colonies would function as sovereign states all tied to one another- similarly to the pre-Soviet Russian Empire. By the time the Constitution was being written, our plans had changed completely. We had made the choice to be one completely solid country, and so the goals changed from freeing individual colonies from British rule so they may self-govern to creating a solid government that was rigid, yet flexible enough to handle the constantly shifting and evolving political and social status of the young nation.
I hope this helps! If it does, please consider marking this Brainliest! Thank you!
Answer:
Because they were disempowered black south africans
Explanation:
Answer:
Practically everyone
Explanation:
FDR was afraid Huey Long would contest the democratic vote in the 1936 election which would split the vote between FDR's "New Dealer's" and Long's "Share The Wealther's". Long also stepped on the toes of Louisiana politicians by using the power of his held office to the fullest extent and received overwhelming public support as he made text books free for all elementary school children, paved new roads, built new bridges, and founded Louisiana State University. All at the cost of the wallets of corrupt politicians who had their money took right out of their bank accounts by Long with his Taxes. To the outrage of the Klan and its sympathizers, Huey Long’s programs to uplift the poor meant that African Americans received public education, healthcare, tax exemptions, and the opportunity to vote free of charge (although the vast majority were still blocked from voting by local "Jim Crow" laws), among other benefits aimed at freeing the disenfranchised from the shackles of poverty. Black ministers even organized Share Our Wealth clubs among their congregations with Long’s blessing, a radical inclusion in 1930s America.
Answer:
In the United States of America, opponents of immigration typically focus on perceived adverse effects, such as economic costs (job competition and burdens on education and social services); negative environmental impact from accelerated population growth; increased crime rates, and in the long run
