Answer:
The correct answer for: Which of the following orientation of the goal orientation theory entails comparisons to others? Is: B)Mastery/performance
Explanation:
To understand this answer we have to analyze each of the elements. First of all, performance is a perfect way to see the level of our capabilities/abilities/competencies. But to learn them we must have to see how they are performed so "mastery" is a must. When we learn we have to copy or follow someone else's patterns to achieve the result we want. Now, when we compare the execution of that certain pattern with the one that our teacher has, we start to see our opportunity areas and strengths. But also we compare our executions with our pairs. Avoidance is when we lose our capabilities and approach when we seek to learn but not perform the learning.
Answer:
The answer is
A. Olive oil, goat cheese, fish, bread, and wine
Sorry if I'm late
Answer:
Democracy itself is defined through the concept of institution. A democracy, Przeworski told us, is possible when the relevant political forces can find institutions that give a reasonable guarantee that their interests will not be affected in an extremely adverse way in democratic competition, that is, when interests are subjected to institutionalized uncertainty. (1986). Trust in institutions is closely linked to political culture. Almond and Verba in The Civic Culture: political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (1963) in a study carried out in 1959, they detect that in what they call a modern society there is much more participation, the key for them would be in the political culture. This refers to the attitude of individuals towards the political system and the role they play as individuals within it. Both attitudes, according to Almond and Verba, can be appreciated through certain patterns of orientation towards the political objects of a nation. These patterns can be of four forms: political orientation, which refers to the internalization of the objects of the political system and the relationships between these objects: the cognitive orientation of the system, which refers to the knowledge of what there is, for example the results of public policy; affective orientation, which focuses on feelings towards the political system, its roles, and functioning; and finally, evaluative orientation, which unites the elements of the previous orientations and allows generating evaluative criteria. Trust in institutions permeates these three levels of political orientation. Finally, Frederick C. Turner and John D. Martz (1997) have analyzed the case of Latin America, where the trust of citizens in institutions is an essential factor for the consolidation of democracy. Ludolfo Paramio (1999) argues that party identification and trust in institutions are conditions for the proper functioning of democracy. In short, institutions are the basis, feed and give value to democracy through various mechanisms at different times. March and Olsen (2006) point out that there are various theoretical approaches to institutions that are distinguished mainly by: first, how they conceive the nature of institutions; second, how they explain the processes that translate into structures and rules and their political impacts, and, lastly, the processes that turn human behavior into rules and structures to maintain, transform or eliminate institutions
The Virginia plan was a plan based on assigning representation to congress based on population sizes. Many small states had deemed this unfair and therefore if the plan had been adopted today, <u>states with larger population would benefit.</u>
Basically, without this movement, people would not have come to America (before 15th century and 11 Century in the north where the Vikings came) and they would not have established the cultures and developed the languages which are still practiced and spoken today (such as the Maya culture/language and the Quechua culture/language).
