This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Answer:
poems, podcasts, articles, and more, writers measure the human effects of war. As they present the realities of life for soldiers returning home, the poets here refrain from depicting popular images of veterans. Still, there are familiar places: the veterans’ hospitals visited by Ben Belitt, Elizabeth Bishop, Etheridge Knight, and W.D. Snodgrass; the minds struggling with post-traumatic stress in Stephen Vincent Benét’s and Bruce Weigl’s poems. Other poets salute particular soldiers, from those who went AWOL (Marvin Bell) to Congressional Medal of Honor winners (Michael S. Harper). Poet-veterans Karl Shapiro, Randall Jarrell, and Siegfried Sassoon reflect on service (“I did as these have done, but did not die”) and everyday life (“Bank-holidays, and picture shows, and spats”). Sophie Jewett pauses to question “the fickle flag of truce.” Sabrina Orah Mark’s soldier fable is as funny as it is heartbreaking—reminding us, as we remember our nation’s veterans, that the questions we ask of war yield no simple answers.
Explanation:
copy and paste it
The correct answer is:
Only Southern states
Explanation:
The doctrine of nullification was created under the concept <em>that </em><em>the Union between the states was formed as an agreement were states designated power to a federal government </em>so every state had <u>the right to void any law </u>they saw as unconstitutional.<em> </em>To void a law three quarters votes of the other states were required.
<em>South Carolina used the Doctrine of Nullification in 1832 </em>to void a federal tariff they saw as unconstitutional, and President Andrew Jackson reacted with the threat of using military force to stop the rebellious act because this doctrine was never admitted in the United States Constitution.
Answer:
This is about the need for transformative change of the SPLA from a liberation army to a professional one that is respected by the people
Explanation:
In December 2015, the Sudan People's Liberation Army in Opposition (SPLA-iO) was ... with information on what is needed to have its army removed from the list
