1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marishachu [46]
3 years ago
14

What is king Darius 1 known for?

Social Studies
2 answers:
AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
6 0
King of Persia and pharoah of Egypt
Feliz [49]3 years ago
6 0
King Darius was a Persian king who was defeated by the Athenians in The Battle of Marathon (First Persian War)
You might be interested in
What is smelting <br><br><br> Hurry
Aleonysh [2.5K]
The answer is D. Just go and look up the definition on google and it will give you your answer.
8 0
3 years ago
If you buy a sealed bag of potato chips in Miami and drive with it to Denver, where the atmospheric pressure is lower, you will
damaskus [11]

Answer and explanation:

As we know, inside the bag of potato chips there is also air. Air is, of course, composed of several gases, such as oxygen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide. When the atmospheric pressure is high, the volume of gas is reduced. Therefore, if the pressure is lowered, the volume increases. That is why the bag gets puffy. You've taken it from a place with higher atmospheric pressure to one where it is lower, so the gas will expand.

8 0
3 years ago
The belief that there is an empirical reality but that our understanding of it is limited by its complexity and by the biases an
alisha [4.7K]

Answer:

Explanation:

The belief that there is an empirical reality, but that our understanding of it is limited by its complexity and by the biases and limitations of researchers is called Postpositivism. Basic science is the effort to figure out what the world is like and why it works as it does.

8 0
3 years ago
Do you think it is a good or bad idea for Quebec to become an independent nation? Explain. (Please use RACE when answering this
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Yes, Quebec should be a country.

Canada is a federation, meaning that its citizens have to pay taxes for both the federal (canadian) government and the provincial (quebec) government. This split makes it harder for the people of Quebec to strategically invest in its own industries. For example, Quebec has long ago nationalized hydroelectricity making the state a leader in green energy. When Quebecers decided to do so, the canadian government refused to invest even a single dollar in the project. Quebec’s prime minister at that time had to go see the americans to ask for a sufficient loan. What a shame it was to the canadian government going against such a nice project! Fast forward to now, Nova Scotia government (another province located next to Quebec being part of the canadian confederation) has the project to built all the infrastructure to export hydroelectricity to the US… and guess what? Canadian Government is totally in favor of the idea and willing to fund the project with fresh capital, part of that capital coming from taxes paid by Quebecers. So Quebec taxes will help fund a competitor since Quebec is already exporting a lot of energy to their US partners while it had absolutely no help when they built their own hydroelectricity project.

This example is just one of the many examples that Quebecers have had to endure over the past decades. When the financial crisis happened in 08-09, Ontario’s auto industry have been bailed out for more than $10 Billion from the Canadian Government (again, part of this money - roughly 20% - came from Quebec’s taxes paid to the federal government). At that same time, Quebec was struggling with its paper/pulp industry and the federal government injected less than 100M$ in the industry to help it. Now Bombardier, one of the great engeneering business of Quebec is struggling, and guess what? Quebec has to inject all of the money to help them since canadian government won't do a single thing.

A lot of the people in Quebec stand against the building of pipelines that would allow dirty oil sands to cross the eastern part of the country for international exportation. Canadians want Quebec to accept the pipeline since it would help the western part of the country to export/sell its dirty oil internationally. As a province, Quebec doesn’t have any legal capacity to oppose to such project while this goes a lot against their willingness. If Quebec was a country, it could oppose to such thing and participate to a greater extend to a cleaner planet. Quebecers have all the capacity and knowledge to invest massively in clean energy and stop using oil for transport over a short timeframe. The only things that is keeping them away is the fact that it does not have control over all its revenues while the federal government have a totally different gameplan.

Being a country would allow Quebecers to gain 100% control over their taxes and would leave them with more money to do good things for the whole planet. We would be leaders in clean energy instead of subsidizing the dirty oilsands in the western part of the country. Our army would be one of peace keeping and territory protection and our peace keeping message would be heard amongst UN and UNESCO. We would be a much better leader amongst nations willing the reduce greenhouse gas instead of financing oil sands. Our engineering firms like Hydro-Quebec would be venturing project like electrification of transport.

Not only Quebec should be a country but people all around the world should support them in their quest for the building of a great new country.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It is morally impermissible to treat people differently unless there are _______ differences between them.
spayn [35]

It is morally impermissible to treat people differently unless there are factual differences between them.

Factual differences. The possibility that the facts with respect to which this Agreement is entered into may differ from the facts that each Party currently knows or believes to be true is recognized and accepted by each of the Parties. The Parties concur that any such discrepancies in reality will not cause the termination or revocation of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.

If there is a disagreement regarding the interpretation, application, operation, or any alleged violation of the Agreement between the Employer and any employee(s), or between the Employer and the Union, the employee(s) shall continue to work in accordance with the Agreement until the disagreement is resolved.

Learn more about Factual differences here

brainly.com/question/21864490

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • which early culture group modified their environment through the use of sand, clay, water, and straw to build adobe houses
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of an informal economic institution?
    14·1 answer
  • n the case of Korematsu v. United States (1944) the Supreme Court ruled that the government did not violate the Constitution by
    7·1 answer
  • What do you find most significant about having a common law system?
    13·1 answer
  • A young adult applying for a job is mildly tense but eager to begin the interview. What does this experience represent?
    13·2 answers
  • How did geography affect life in the northern colonies
    6·1 answer
  • How is the transfer of energy different in electromagnetic waves compared to mechanical waves?
    15·2 answers
  • Which event is correctly matched with its description?
    12·2 answers
  • The number that is used to show the value of one currency compared to another is called the __________. A. trade rate B. currenc
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Which Middle Eastern economy has the most free (from government control) mixed economy? *
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!