There have been many film adaptations of Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein. How do most film adaptations differ from the origina
l text version of the story? They make the story more exciting by only giving Victor’s version. They create more sympathy for the creature by giving him a back story. They create less sympathy for the creature by making him a mindless beast. They are less complex because they lack the multiple perspectives of the novel.
I would say the correct answer is that they <span>create less sympathy for the creature by making him a mindless beast. In the book, Frankenstein's monster is a sentient being, able to speak, think, and feel. In the movies, however, he is portrayed as a beast, unable to do any of the things mentioned in the book, except to go around killing people, which is not the point of the book. </span>