I think it is supposed to have an impact on the reader by telling us about how much they enjoyed going to New York for the dalzzling parties
Jane told me they were taking the nine o’clock plane. 2. I’ll have to get up early. She said that she'll need to arise early.
<h3>What is accurate sentence?</h3>
In order for a sentence to be grammatically accurate, the problem and verb have to each be singular or plural. In different words, the problem and verb have to trust each other of their tense. If the problem is in plural form, the verb must additionally be in plur al form (and vice versa).
- She advised me she would not like to tour via way of means of air.
- But she determined that it became the perfect manner to travel.
- She advised me they had been going to spend per week in Paris.
- She stated she desired to move up the Eiffel Tower.
- She advised me that they have been to Paris before.
- But she stated that they have not visible everything.
- He advised me that he's going to ship me a postcard.
Read more about the sentence:
brainly.com/question/11352260
#SPJ1
Answer:
1: Cruel
2: upper-class
3: Out-dated
4: economy
5: law
6: Damage
7:Respect
8: Illegal
9: BAN
Was that right?
Let me know what numbers were correct or wrong
And for #8, You may notice there are 3 "L"'s at the beginning but the really first one is actually an "i"
Https://rampages.us/balder/2015/10/05/55/
A link to a summary of the book and why she named it that .
Sin or public health taxes are excise taxes imposed on the consumption of potentially harmful goods for health [sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), tobacco, alcohol, among others], aiming to reduce consumption, raise additional revenue and/or improve population health. This paper assesses the extent to which sin taxes (a) can reduce consumption of potentially harmful goods, (b) raise revenue for national health systems and (c) contribute to population health in Latin America. A systematic literature review was conducted on peer-reviewed and grey literature; endpoints included: impact of raising sin taxes on consumption, ability to raise revenue for health and the possibility of population health improvements. Risk of bias for each study was assessed. The synthesis of the literature on sin tax implementation showed improvements in all three endpoints across the study countries. Following the introduction of sin taxes or by simulating their potential impact, nearly all studies explicitly reported that consumption of potentially harmful goods (mainly SSBs and tobacco) declined; revenue was found to have increased in almost all countries, suggesting that there may be additional scope for further tax increase. Simulated improvements in population health have also been shown, by demonstrating a relationship between sin tax increases and reduction in prevalence of diabetes, stroke, heart attacks and associated deaths. However, sin tax effects on health would be better quantified over the long-term. Data quality and availability challenges did place some limitations on sin tax impact assessment. Sin taxes can be effective in reducing consumption of potentially harmful goods, improve population health and generate additional revenue. Promoting further research on this topic should be a priority.
