where is the story? Then i can answer
It's intended emotional effect on the reader. Feel free to ask more questions if needed
Answer:
The first response
Explanation:
The first response is the only claim that makes sense. To check, let's use the process of elimination.
Second: Calling the scientists' surveys unsophisticated is irrelevant and does not prove that the original claim is correct.
Third: This option does not address the points made by the counterclaim and instead pushes the original idea. It is important to remember that it is supposed to be a response, not a new statement.
Fourth: This response gives up on the original idea and ends the debate, with the counterclaim winning.
Inarticulate means not being able to speak or express clearly. In this case, Peter was inarticulate because he was angry when Mr. Dussel teases Peter about his cat which he loves very much. Not the same with Mr. Dussel who claims he is allergic to cats.
