Answer:
4(-9)= -36
Step-by-step explanation:
Since there's a negative on the 9 it will affect the product. So the answer is supposed to be a - 36.
Answer:
Natalia's work is wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
Natalia divided a decimal number by an entire number. Since division is a operation derived from multiplication, the best approach to check if work was good is multiplying the given result by denomination, that is:
1) 
Given.
2) 
Definition of addition.
3) 
Distributive property.
4) 
Definitions of multiplication and decimal number.
5) ![x = 72 +[2\cdot (10)^{-1}]\cdot 12](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%20%3D%2072%20%2B%5B2%5Ccdot%20%2810%29%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5Ccdot%2012)
Definition of division/Associative property.
6) ![x = 72 + [2\cdot 12]\cdot (10)^{-1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%20%3D%2072%20%2B%20%5B2%5Ccdot%2012%5D%5Ccdot%20%2810%29%5E%7B-1%7D)
Associative property.
7) 
Definition of multiplication.
8) 
Definition of divsion.
9) 
Defintion of decimal number.
10) 
Definition of addition/Result
Natalia's work is wrong.
Answer:
8 x 12 = 96!
Step-by-step explanation:
It is the same as 8 x 12, which would have the answer of 96.
<span>Combinations. This is because in combinations the order does not matter
</span>
The only way the expression can be factored is if a -3 is pulled out...
-3(5t+2)
