Explanation:
Human society is continuously shaped by social, political, and technological developments. Some societies reject these developments and others embrace them. Normally, the rejection or acceptance is silent and smooth. At times, however, the process is violent and leads to conflict or revolution. According to Samuel Huntington, “a revolution is a rapid, fundamental, and violent domestic change in the dominant values and myths of a society, in its institutions, social structure, leadership, and government activity and policies.”[1] The Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 were marred by ardent violence and political maneuvering. This article will analyze both revolutions, illustrating that the revolution of 1905 was both a precursor and cause of the 1917 revolution, while having its own precursors and causes.
Aided by brutal defeats and unprecedented loss of life in two wars, the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 were the collective backlash of the masses against the corrupt, incompetent, and uncaring autocracy of the Tsarist Regime which was unable and unwilling to change with the times. Moreover, the revolutions hardly yielded the type of productive and egalitarian change that masses called for. Thus, these revolutions serve as a cautionary tale for both governments and revolutionaries.
Answer:
Munich Agreement, settlement reached by Germany, Britain, France, and Italy in ... German annexation of the Sudetenland, in western Czechoslovakia. ... After his success in absorbing Austria into Germany proper in March 1938, Adolf ... and then precipitated World War II by invading Poland in September.
Explanation:
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that Pizarro is not matched correctly, since he conquered the Incan Empire, not the Aztecs. </span></span>
C.He had fought several battles and then an armistice halted his movement.
