The essayist specifies how their advantage in this field was ignited. The essayist states how an individual encounter connects with a future objective.
<h3>What was goal of writer?</h3>
The author said As she easily showed her abilities, a sugary, mixed chocolate fragrance consumed the space, and I knew from that second on that I was destined to be a baked good gourmet expert as pastry chef.
It says that how she needed to be a cake gourmet expert as pastry chef and how his own experience made a future objective for her.
For more information about pastry chef, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/7537843
Answer:
The answer is indeed letter C. "Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed."
Explanation:
Zaroff and Rainsford are characters in Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game." They are both dexterous hunters who have no empathy for their prey. The one difference between them is that Rainsford hunts animals, while Zaroff hunts men.
Rainsford becomes Zaroff's brand new game. By the end of the story, he has managed to escape the forest and enter Zaroff's house unnoticed. Once Zaroff enters his own bedroom, Rainsford appears. <u>Zaroff had promised to let Rainsford go if he managed to remain alive for three days after the hunt started. However, even though he admits Rainsford has won, he does not intend to let him go. </u>This is what he says:
C. "Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed."
<u>Zaroff is confident he will kill Rainsford and feed him to his dogs. Rainsford has no choice but fight and kill Zaroff to guarantee his own survival.</u> That is what he does.
Sorry but what is the question?
It really depends on the question, although if you were not given a prompt, here are some ideas:
Dogs are great emotional support animals.
Dogs have hair.
Anything can be a thesis, as long as you can back your thesis up with at least three proofs.<span />
