Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
Answer:
Australia's losses on the Western Front were staggering, with more casualties in the first six weeks of our involvement than the entire eight-month Gallipoli campaign. By the end of 1918, 46,000 Australians had lost their lives and 132,000 were wounded.
Explanation:
They needed to hunt,in order for them to survive they needed food and a way to defend them self from danger. so it would be ether hunt or weapons
The goal of Bill and Melinda Gates is to offer the chance to significantly raise the standard of living for billions of people in poverty, health, and education.
<h3>What is the reason to make Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation successful?</h3>
Great foundations have a goal that aims to solve a significant problem or problem. A foundation may focus on any subjects it chooses, but to be regarded as significant, its goal must be on matters of vital concern.
Thus, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation greatly improves the health, education, and living standards of billions of people, and the achievement of the organization's objective must be due to issues of paramount importance.
Learn more about Bill and Melinda here:
brainly.com/question/24104407
#SPJ1
