I think the answer is (B. Vocation) [UnSure]
Answer:
The correct answer for: Put the voyages by the early European explorers in chronological order. Is:
Giel Eannes
Christopher Columbus
Bartolomeu Dias
John Cabot
Ferdinand Magellan
Explanation:
To understand this answer we need to analyze all of the options:
Chirstopher Columbus was an Italian explorar that in 1942 discovered the Bahamas.
John Cabot was an Italian explorer that discovered the cost of north america in 1497.
Bartolomeu Dias a portuguese explorar that in 1486 headed an expedition trough africa to find a way to India.
Gil Eannes was a portuguese explorer that joined Prince Henry's expedition in 1433.
Ferdinand Magellan was a portuguese explorer who travelled to the east indies in 1519.
I'll first explain what the non-aggression pact was. It was an agreement that the Soviet Union and Germany would take no military action against each other. To answer your question it is B. The pact was to make sure he could safely attack Poland.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to choose the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The three specific arguments in favor of why this Amendment is necessary in a democratic society are the following.
1.- One of the most important characteristics of modern democratic societies is that citizens are free. Without freedom, there is no democracy.
2.- People have their own set of belief systems and they will always have them. It is intrinsic to human nature. No matter what religion people profess, it is their right.
3.- The right to assemble in a peaceful way to exchange ideas, no matter what kind of ideas, it's part of any democratic government and society in the world.
The two arguments against why this Amendment may no longer be necessary in today's America.
1.- It is so implicit that citizens have rights that will come a day in which this value of liberty would have no need to be part of a Bill of Rights.
2.- Science and the use of logic could be a substitute for the ingraining belief that people need religion to have something to believe in. When science could be able to explain it all through the use of reason, maybe there won't be the necessity to include freedom of religion as part of the Bill of Rights.
In order to truly understand an event - whether personal or historical - it is necessary to look at it from multiple perspectives.
Just like you cannot understand history from just one book, you need to ask multiple persons to help you with your personal event.
