1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Burka [1]
3 years ago
11

How might a Venezuelan cartoonist view Big Stick diplomacy differently?

History
1 answer:
Murrr4er [49]3 years ago
7 0
The venezuelan cartoonist view big stick diplomacy differently by viewing it as unnecessary. Hope you have a nice day!
You might be interested in
6. Getting a college degree is a good idea because
Arlecino [84]
You will get a better job in the future
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
20 points!! please help!!!!<br> Just 5 sentence paragraph!!!
SCORPION-xisa [38]
Hitler was popular among his people because not only were they looking for a scapegoat to blame for their problems, but because in their eyes he was fixing Germany’s problems and making her into a powerful nation once more. Schools should cover the Holocaust so that the children of today can learn from the mistakes of yesteryears, and prevent such from happening again in our times. We can prevent such from happening again from teaching children the mistakes that lead to the genocide of ~6 million people, like the acceptance of violence and discrimination, the political manipulation of anger, scapegoating, and the unchecked thrive if the extreme far-right. Some people could deny the Holocaust because they can’t comprehend the scale, that six million people could be slaughtered in just a few years, or that they outright refuse to accept the facts for what they are. Yes, I believe that the Nazi soldiers were rightly arrested and charged for their war crimes, even though they were “only following their orders”. They could have easily refused such roles or refuse to follow their orders, but they chose to save themselves from their own death by allowing the deaths of six million people. People such as Oskar Schindler and Major Karl Plagge show that they did not have to blindly follow their orders, that they could use their morals and conscience to see what they were doing was horrible and inhuman.
3 0
3 years ago
Explain why the northern earls revolted against Elizabeth I in 1569
marissa [1.9K]

Answer: The northern earls wanted Catholicism restored in England, instead of the Protestant Church which existed instead.

Explanation: the Northern Earls had become enraged over a number of issues that it led to the Revolt of the Northern Earls in 1569 and this was one of the issues The northern earls wanted Catholicism restored in England, instead of the Protestant Church which existed instead.

With communication being so difficult during the reign of Elizabeth, it was very difficult to govern such as large country and ensure that everyone was doing what they were supposed to. As a result of this many people in the North of England were still Catholics. This counted against the Northern nobles who remained loyal to Catholicism, when Elizabeth became Queen. Elizabeth as a Protestant promoted Protestants to key government positions of power.

During 1569, the Northern Earls had become enraged over a number of issues that it led to the Revolt of the Northern Earls in 1569. The Earls, first and foremost disagreed with Elizabeth about religion. They wanted Catholicism restored in England, instead of the Protestant Church which existed instead. Secondly, as a result of their Catholicism they had lost a great deal of influence at Court and this had annoyed many. In addition to this, Elizabeth’s lifestyle choices provoked the Earls as she refused to marry or to name and heir, leaving the future of the Kingdom in doubt.

There was however a solution to all of their problems. They had Elizabeth’s cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots as a figurehead who could replace Elizabeth. By replacing Elizabeth as Queen, Mary would be able to restore Catholicism, return the Earls to a position of influence and marry another Catholic to ensure the safety of Catholicism in England.

The key figures in the plot were Thomas Percy, the Earl of Northumberland; Charles Neville, Earl of Westmorland and Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk. Both Neville and Percy had lost position at court, and Norfolk too felt displaced as a result of the younger Protestant nobles which Elizabeth doted on.

It can be argued that the Revolt of the Northern Earls was a religious dispute, as the Earls wanted the restoration of Catholicism in England. Elizabeth had appointed James Pilkington as Archbishop of Durham in 1561. Pilkington was a Protestant and his appointment was supposed to stamp out Catholicism in northern England. Pilkington was harsh in his methods, and instead of turning the masses to Protestantism, the opposite occurred with many turning away from Protestantism and embracing Catholicism more fully.

However, some have argued that the Revolt was in fact a political problem rather than a religious one. Many of the Earls had felt displaced at court and a result began to detest Elizabeth. For Percy, the appointment of Sir John Forster as the Earl in charge of protecting England’s borders with Scotland cut deep. Many Earls did not like the influence and power that many ‘newcomers’ had over Elizabeth. In addition to this, Elizabeth refused to have an heir to succeed her. The Earls wanted to replace Elizabeth with Mary, Queen of Scots which would have ensured that the succession was secure. Mary, would marry the Duke of Norfolk and create an heir resulting in stability for England.

5 0
3 years ago
Under Roosevelt's New Deal, what group of people were the first to be helped? big business working class Federal banks upper cla
Mumz [18]
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "working class." Under Roosevelt's New Deal, the group of people were the first to be helped are the <span>working class. He has to make sure because these working class are the possible ones who can increase the economy.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the significance of the fall of Constantinople in 1453?
muminat
Mehmed surrounded Constantinople from land and Sea while by employing iCannon to maintain a constant barrage of the cities formidable walls. The fall of the city removed what was once a powerful defense for Christian Europe against Muslim invasion allowing for it uninterrupted Ottoman expansion into Eastern Europe.

Give me brainliest
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the indus valley civilization disappear
    11·1 answer
  • What is Metallurgy
    6·1 answer
  • New York was a colony with ____, or a great variety of people
    12·2 answers
  • Why is “promote a general welfare” the principle that applies to the debate about universal health care?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the most likely reason George Washington refused a thirds term as persident
    6·1 answer
  • According to Thomas Paine, what are the three components of the British Constitution that needed to be examined and improved for
    14·1 answer
  • What was one government reform enacted by the tang dynasty
    8·1 answer
  • What was the point of Lights out curfew?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following was chief concern among people of the Ice Age?
    10·1 answer
  • 1. What is the summit of the Creator's work?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!