The author has used rhetorical devices like parallelism to emphasize the miserable and hopeless condition of the migrants who were despised and hated but had no option but to swarm the town to fight hunger and survive.
<u>Explanation
:</u>
The chapter talks about the agrarians who were ruined by industrialization. Industries and technology pushed them on the roads. They moved in search of food and to give their families a meal to survive.
Parallelism has been employed at places to underline the misery, the dejection and distress.
For instance, in one of the paragraphs, just to stress on the simplicity of the agrarian folks before they were brought near to doom: ‘a simple agrarian folk who had not changed …….. who had not farmed. They had not grown up….’
This repetition of phrases and clauses is parallelism. The chapter is replete with such examples. It lends it unity and realism and appeals to emotions.
Well, this is obviously a matter of opinion, but personally, I would not want to go through Odysseus's experiences. He suffered a lot trying to get home to Ithaca.
On the other hand, Odysseus's ordeal was no doubt an adventure! He fought monsters and had to use his great cunning to think his way out of sticky situations. It depends on what you think.
Answer: The effects from 9/11 are mainly the lives lost and the spot where the twin towers used to be is now a small memorial spot with the names with everyone that died. There is also the fact that people have to go through that day every year.
Explanation:
When the -ing form of a verb is used as the main verb of the predicate, the auxiliary must contain a form of <u>be</u>.
<h3>What is a verb?</h3>
It should be noted that a verb simply means a action word that's used to illustrate that something has occured.
In this case, when the -ing form of a verb is used as the main verb of the predicate, the auxiliary must contain a form of be.
Learn more about verb on:
brainly.com/question/1718605
#SPJ1