Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Globalization is a huge danger to local cultures because it can rob them of their identify by imposing a fit-for-all culture known all over the world.
Local cultures prosper because they are local and unique, far away from the global influence. Globalization brings people together but it also makes them all look alike because they are exposed to the same influences, in culture, business or politics. Some local tradition may become too old fashioned for many to be still followed and they may disappear, especially if the young people reject them because they don't seem attractive any longer. To prevent local culture, some rituals have to be maintained and pass over to the next generation, globalization jeopardizes this process and some local cultures may become extinct in the end.
Answer:
C. It would establish the precedent that Congress could do anything it wanted for the good of the nation, thus destroying the entire system of delegated and reserved powers.
Explanation:
According to Thomas Jefferson, what would be the long-term consequence of chartering a national bank? It would establish the precedent that Congress could do anything it wanted for the good of the nation, thus destroying the entire system of delegated and reserved powers.
~OwOjaxxy~
Hopes this helps~
Yes i would. That would be a great opprtunity.Do you want to be a member.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
The Great Society were programs developed and put forth by Democrat President L. Johnson in 1964 with the goal of eradicating poverty and racial injustices. Spending for these programs were put towards education, urban issues, health care, transportation, and poverty (present day Medicare, Medicaid, and federal funding for education).
Johnson and activists worked together to put forth studies of American socities, reported on findings to corresponding agencies, and assisted many civil rights laws including the Civil Rights law of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, The Immigration and nationality Services Act of 1965, and the Civil Rights Act of 1968.
