Answer:
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
Explanation:
Hello. You did not enter the text to which this question refers, which makes it very difficult to answer it exactly. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
As you showed that the word "author" in line 10 was used as a proper noun, we can consider that the same word in line 4 was used in a general way and did not specify an exact person. This is because proper nouns are terms used to specify something or someone, as the question states that the word "author" was not used with the same meaning in line 4, we can consider that this is the difference.
The main reason why Afghanis may have been willing to accept Taliban rule by 1998 is because usually in periods of crisis people turn to strong and sometimes violent leaders to lead them out.
This is the answer <span>Yes hey exempted the Western Hemisphere from the quota system</span>
Citizens. Everyone is equally protected by the law.
