Answer:
$2,443.95
Explanation:
Given:
Purchased inventory = $4,900
Freight bill paid = $310
Manufacturing returned = 35%
Purchase discount = 33%
Now,
The value of Purchase returns = 35% of $4,900
= 0.35 × $4,900
= $1,715
Therefore,
The Net purchases = Purchased inventory - Purchase returned
or
= $4,900 - $1,715
= $3,185
Also,
Discount = 33% of $3,185
= $1,051.05
Therefore, the final cost of inventory = Net purchases - Discounts + Freight
= $3185 - $1051.05 + $310
= $2,443.95
It is true that a clear understanding of ethical expectations is essential for a sector such as lobbying, where there can be illicit behavior in favor of individual benefits.
<h3 /><h3>Lobbying</h3>
It corresponds to the influence of a group in the decisions of public power to favor its objectives.
To avoid unethical lobbying, there needs to be greater dissemination of information about this practice and greater control over the acceptance of contributions from interests, preventing the power of lobbyists over legislators.
The correct answer is:
Find out more information about lobbying here:
brainly.com/question/25117359
Answer: The correct answer is True.
Explanation: This is a case of employer liability - employers are liable to their employees' act, whether it was due to the employer's intention or not, or whether the employer means to cause harm or not, provided the employees still act within the scope of their employment. The same applies if the employees had carried out good deeds within the scope of their employment, the employers share the good news - just the same way an employer profits from employee's labor, the employer is legally liable when the employee commits harm.
Employers are <em>vicariously liable</em> under doctrine of "respondeat superior" for the negligence or omissions caused by their employees during the course of their employment with the company. The doctrine of "respondeat superior" according to Law dictionary means a doctrine in tort law that makes a master liable for the wrong of a servant. There was a particular scenario I witnessed: a colleague of mine while working late at work had a visitor at the Reception and opted to see him. Unfortunately for her, an accident happended - a car broke into the office and she sustained a lot of injuries. The employer paid for all her reimbursable expenses during her treatment, paid her mum a certain amount for taking care of her, including buying her a new phone because the old one got damaged during the accident although insurance took care of some of the health bills. Because the employer knew it was binding in the court of law, she could not be forced to resume. She eventually resumed after 6 months!
Answer:
Euro would depreciate in value against the U.S. Dollar.
Explanation:
It can be said that if the European economy experiences a recession but not the U.S. then the most likely scenario would be that the Euro would depreciate in value against the U.S. Dollar. This means that the price of the Euro would decrease and a U.S. Dollar will be able to be exchanged for a greater quantity of European Euros.
