Evidence-based practise (EBP) is the process of making decisions regarding the care of the people you serve using the most recent, highest-quality research (including external and internal scientific evidence).
The actions to encourage the use of EBPs might be seen from the viewpoint of persons who do research or produce knowledge.
The three strategies of Evidence-based practise (EBP) are:
- the generation and distillation of information;
- its spread and dissemination; and
- its acceptance and use within organisations.
The first step in these stages of knowledge transfer, which are seen through the eyes of researchers and knowledge makers, is deciding which discoveries from the patient safety portfolio or specific research projects should be shared.
To learn more about Evidence-based practise (EBP), refer
brainly.com/question/11056307
#SPJ4
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
It is right for university lecturers to do so, since they are not breaking any law or regulations, from my own point of view. You said that we should assume that the said lecturer, Professor Harry is my supervisor and he just published the results of is research- his own research, the research belongs to him, the research is his intellectual property and he should have the right to sell or not to sell.
Let us consider the Bayh-Dole Act, which allowed universities to keep and profit from the patents their students and researchers developed on campus using federal funds.
So, if this is allowed, professors should also be able to commercialize their research(es).
Include their economical situation and their sexual performances.
No because a democracy is a system of government by the whole population and a dictatorship is ruled by one individual