"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Which of the following possible court cases could be argued under the terms of the quote above? (4 points) a person sues the state for building an armory on nearby property a person refuses to serve the military when called up through a draft a person shoots and kills someone who broke into the family's home a person rejects police requests to unlock the car doors and windows
A person rejects police requests to unlock the car doors and windows.
Explanation:
If a person rejected police requests to unlock the car doors and windows, he could argue his case by using this quote. The quote states that people have a right to their own person and their own things. This means that the government cannot force them to undergo unreasonable searches.
The Lords Proprietors had failed to help defend the colonists against French, Spanish, pirate and Indian attacks. LPs also did not want to sell land to the colonists.
the 1860s, Otto von Bismarck, then Minister President of Prussia, provoked three short, decisive wars against Denmark, Austria, and France, aligning the smaller German states behind Prussia in its defeat of France. In 1871 he unified Germany into a nation-state, forming the German Empire.
