<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
Federalists were lately responsible for writing the constitution. they believed in a strong federal government that had the authority to deal with a diff issues that may come up...hope that helps
The rise of the public sphere and public opinion.
The growth of a print culture and literary market - newspapers etc, the multiplier effect.
The rise of coffee houses, clubs, social gatherings. The voice of the street
The breakdown of absolutist politics.
Answer:uguk.tiytluti.utuggyyerryy55
Explanation:
ytdmngdrdubgtdihgdhtedmrjtjdjdtjtdmtjjtjgh
Answer: 9/11 ocurrió el 11 de septiembre en Washington.
Explanation:
Ese día era cuando unos terroristas vinieron a los Estados Unidos por avión y le dieron a las torres causando más de 3000+ de personas y policías murieron
