<span>In these two stories or literary novels"Sixteen" by Maureen Daly and "Through the Tunnel" by Doris Lessing "who are both authors or wordsmiths, Maureen Daly and Doris Lessing" uses a theme, subject, or topic matter of their characters or dramatis personae who are wanting to prove, validate, and justify themselves to someone. However, the differences, distinctions ,or variation of these two stories or literary novels becomes starkly useless , entirely obsolete, and exhaustively and consummately kaput when who or whom the two characters or dramatis personae aspire to prove, validate, and justify themselves to. In "Sixteen" by Maureen Daly the principal character, main character, or dramatis personae seems to be attempting or trying really and truly hard to prove, validate, and justify herself to the reader, that she is insightful and perceptive enough and popular enough to congruous be telling this story or literary novel. But in "Through the Tunnel" Jerry attempts or tries really and truly hard to prove, validate, and justify himself to the older, mature looking men he looks up to and withal to himself. Throughout each story or literary novel, the characters or dramatis personae attempt or try to prove, validate, and justify something to themselves or other people or characters. In Doris Lessing's short story or literary novel"Through the Tunnel"" by Doris Lessing" the principal character, main character, or dramatis personae who or whom we can apperceive or apperceive as Jerry opportunely accommodated or made acquaintance himself with a group of older, mature looking men hanging around in a wild-looking bay, cove ,or estuary full of rocks. These two completely and totally different short stories or literary novels "Sixteen" by Maureen Daly and "Through the Tunnel" by Doris Lessing are both chock full of kindred spirits predicated on the absolute fact that both characters or dramatis personae attempt </span> <span>or try to prove, validate, and justify something to someone, but they are different because those someones are different in these two stories or literary novel. While both stories or literary novels are starkly different in subject, theme ,or topic matter that both principal characters, main characters, or dramatis personae attempt or try to prove, validate, and justify themselves to someone. In "Sixteen," by Maureen Daly it is the reader. In the story or literary novels "Through the Tunnel," by Doris Lessing it is the older, mature looking men and later himself that makes Jerry to push past his inhibitions and fears and conquer or overcome them . The second homogeneous or same attribute or kindred characteristic between the two stories or literary novels is that the people or characters who had transpired to repeal the principal characters, main characters ,or dramatis personae which of course whom never present themselves again, are the leading cause that prompts both characters or dramatis personae in these two stories or literary novels by of course being ostentatious with their earnest and veracious and genuine general and exhaustively simply authentic and true feelings and motivations all throughout these two stories or literary novels.</span>
Choosing a job because you get more money over a job that you would enjoy is what I would call not smart. My reasons are because: I would love a job everyone was my friends, I knew everything, and people can count on me. Working at a job you enjoy is like you're living in a Christmas-everyday wonderland. You wanna know why, well because you have friends that you can count on and can talk to when you're bored. If you work in a place where there was no joy and you just get payed more then that would mean you would have no friends because other people are working there butts off trying to work hard to earn the money they're getting on their pay day. Also not only would you be able to count on others but others can count on you. That would mean that you would know stuff and at the same time are being trusted. Now if you worked in a place that you get more money though, then the other people would wanna be showing off to their boss so they can get paid extra and you wouldn't be trusted even though you aren't doing anything wrong In addition, Like I said all of these are technically that people can count on you and you can count on other people. Usually people say "Treat others the way you wanna be treated" so if you get trusted by people, you can also trust the people that are trusting you to do stuff. In conclusion, just think about what I said: If you were to choose one of these it would be better to work in a place everyone is friends, can count on you and you count on them, and you can still know what you need to know. Not the other way around or else you wouldn't enjoy working there even if you were being payed well.
I'm pretty sure that was either 100 words or more than 100 words. If you are to write an essay about this, you can use my essay for some parts, just don't copy all of what I wrote or you can write some of it just don't copy word-by-word. Which would be plagiarism.