The crafters of the United States constitution wanted a system of government wherein the people had a voice in their ruling but at the same time, the crafters were worried that the people would rule like a mob without checks and that the majority would persecute the minorities in the country.
Both the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists agreed that there were dangers inherent in the system, which is why the crafters created a system with checks and balances on the lawmaking process and a bicameral legislature with a body, the US Senate, whose job is to ensure that cooler heads always prevail.
This shows the influence of thinkers like Edmund Burke, a British philosopher, who advocated for incremental change.
The cost of this is that things do move slowly and sometimes the legislatures misses the ball. The response to this has been a stronger Executive branch with the power to create temporary executive orders but the process is still slow.
The benefit is an incremental system that has lasted longer than any system of Government in the world.
The question is whether or not America's system can adequately work in a time when new challenges and threats are coming every minute.
By banning people from visiting Palastine. I think that's the answer.
Explanation:
The year 622 brought a new challenge to Christianity. Near Mecca, Saudi Arabia, a prophet named Muhammad claimed he received a revelation that became a cornerstone of the Islamic faith. The Koran, which Muhammad wrote in Arabic, identified Jesus Christ not as God but as a prophet. <em><u>Islam</u></em> spread throughout the Middle East and into Europe until 732.Soon thereafter, European Christians began the <em><u>Crusades</u></em>, a campaign of violence against Muslims to dominate the <em><u>Holy Lands</u></em>—an area that extended from modern-day Turkey in the north along the Mediterranean coast to the Sinai Peninsula—under Islamic control, partially in response to sustained Muslim control in Europe. The city of Jerusalem is a holy site for Jews, Christians, and Muslims; evidence exists that the three religions lived there in harmony for centuries. But in 1095, European Christians decided not only to reclaim the holy city from Muslim rulers but also to conquer the entire surrounding area.
The answer is B. discharge. Hope I helped!!!
Answer:
1. Cultural exchange of gunpowder
2. Cross Cultural exchange was Through Europeans.
3. Spread of islam
Explanation:
1. There was a cultural exchange of gunpowder by the Mongols. Tang and Song dynasties were non nomadic and used gun powder. When expanses of land like southern Asia and eastern Europe was being conquered by nomadic Mongols, gunpowder was spread to non nomadic areas.
2. Cross cultural exchange was through European dominated trade, this was by the Dutch and Portuguese. Trade was mostly sea based and central Asian nomads had no access to this. This development limited Central Asia in cross regional exchange.
3. One cross cultural exchange was that Non nomadic merchants spread Islam to areas in India.
