The theories of Hamilton are most persuasive when upholding Legal procedure.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
One of its main themes of the Washington government was the clash between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson on the organization of a two-party system,
Hamilton's strategy for the National Bank formed a controversy along the same lines,
Hamilton and the Federalists supporting the National Bank, while Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans opposed it.
This makes sense to give Parliament the freedom to act and understanding necessary to deal with different situations.
Yet, as Jefferson suggests, the laws that grant Congress so much authority if the legal system shall not be upheld. Recall that for Jefferson he advocated the Constitution's act, so the clause was not as meaningful for him as the Amendment could be amended to respond to new needs.
I think it’s Mikhail Gorbachev
the consumption of alcohol was illegal
shortly after this it became legalized again and it was passed on
The answer is true.
There have been some disruption such as the acts of the Red Army Faction
but West Germany had a stable government where various political parties have
been able to take part on national issues.
Just like other countries the political trends vary depending on which
party governs the government.
...As a response to the Protestant Reformation, the Catholic Church began a program to enact reform from within. The purpose of the Counter/Catholic Reformation was to end corruption, return to traditional teachings, and to strengthen the church in an attempt to stop its members from converting.<span>SO your answer is B</span>
