1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Grace [21]
3 years ago
11

Is there definite and concrete-evidence that God exists?

History
2 answers:
ANEK [815]3 years ago
5 0
No there is no concrete-evidence that God exists but, it is more of something you want to believe and hope is true i guess.
Vikentia [17]3 years ago
3 0
There is not definite or concrete evidence that any god exists. God is just a placebo people use to rid themselves of their insecurities. The only "evidence" of god is the bible, however the only "evidence" that the bible is a valid book is that god wrote it. This is called circular logic, it does not work. 

The existence of the christian god is most definitely not valid. 
Their god is described as omnipotent and omnibenevolent.

Omnipotent = Capable of evil
Omnibenevolent = Not capable of evil

Using this definition to describe someone has the same amount of accuracy as saying that there can be a square circle.

Another contradiction is the myth of free will in the bible. The christian god has apparently given everyone free will, yet he is all-knowing. This means that he knows exactly how you will live your life, moment by moment. This is a contradiction, if he is all-knowing, then you do not have free will.

Overall, there is completely no definite and concrete-evidence that god exists. In fact, it is more probable that he does not exist because he, himself is a paradox.




You might be interested in
what is the purpose of the federal deposit insurance corporation? a. to keep banks on the gold standard b. to protect depositors
Sedbober [7]
The primary purpose of the federal deposit insurance corporation is to "protect depositors from the loss". This also inspires confidence in the economy as a whole. 
6 0
3 years ago
How did powhanton confederacy interact with the british
Tanya [424]

Answer:

Powhanton confederacy was a group of Native American tribes, in the Virginia area. Their relationship with British settlers was not good. They thought that the British wanted to enslave them.

The British did not want to make an effort to earn anything, rather they wanted faster means of wealth and comfort. The Leader of the Powhanton confederacy tried to befriend the British by showing his hospitality through food and offerings. He invited them on events and treated them nicely to make them feel comfortable.

6 0
3 years ago
Explain ONE historical development that contributed to the context for rise of extremist groups prior to World War II.
kirill115 [55]

Answer: PLZ GIVE BRAINLEST

Explanation:

Historians from many countries have given considerable attention to studying and understanding the causes of World War II, a global war from 1939 to 1945 that was the deadliest conflict in human history. The immediate precipitating event was the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany on September 1, 1939, and the subsequent declarations of war on Germany made by Britain and France, but many other prior events have been suggested as ultimate causes. Primary themes in historical analysis of the war's origins include the political takeover of Germany in 1933 by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party; Japanese militarism against China, which led to the Second Sino-Japanese War; Italian aggression against Ethiopia, which led to the Second Italo-Ethiopian War; and Germany's initial success in negotiating a neutrality pact with the Soviet Union to divide territorial control of Eastern Europe between them.

During the Battle of Westerplatte, the German battleship Schleswig-Holstein attacks Westerplatte at the start of the war, September 1, 1939

The destroyer USS Shaw explodes during the attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941

During the interwar period, deep anger arose in the Weimar Republic regarding the conditions of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, which punished Germany for its role in World War I with severe conditions and heavy financial reparations in order to prevent it from ever becoming a military power again. This provoked strong currents of revanchism in German politics, with complaints primarily focused on the demilitarization of the Rhineland, the prohibition of German unification with Austria, and the loss of some German-speaking territories and overseas colonies.

The 1930s were a decade in which democracy was in disrepute; countries across the world turned to authoritarian regimes during the worldwide economic crisis of the Great Depression.[1] In Germany, resentment and hatred of other countries was intensified by the end of World War I in late 1918, the world's social and geopolitical circumstances had fundamentally and irrevocably changed. The Allies had been victorious, but many of Europe's economies and infrastructures were devastated, including those of the victors. France, along with the other victor countries, was in a desperate situation regarding its economy, security, and morale, and understood that its position in 1918 was "artificial and transitory".[2] Thus, Prime Minister of France Georges Clemenceau worked to gain French security via the Treaty of Versailles, and French security demands, such as reparations, coal payments, and a demilitarized Rhineland, took precedence at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919–1920,[2] which designed the treaty. The war "must be someone's fault – and that's a very natural human reaction" analyzed historian Margaret MacMillan.[3] Germany was charged with the sole responsibility of starting World War I, and the "War Guilt Clause" was the first step towards a satisfying revenge for the victor countries, namely France, against Germany. Ginsberg argues, "France was greatly weakened and, in its weakness and fear of a resurgent Germany, sought to isolate and punish Germany....French revenge would come back to haunt France during the Nazi invasion and occupation twenty years later."[4]

7 0
3 years ago
The following political actions which occurred during the Enlightenment are contradictory to the ideas of the Enlightenment, exc
REY [17]
The following political actions which occurred during the Enlightenment are contradictory to the ideas of the Enlightenment, except "<span>c. the battle in North America between the British and French for colonies," since this was primarily over territorial disputes. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Why should citizens pay taxes? ОА. The tax money funds charities for underprivileged people. ов. The tax money supports nongover
bija089 [108]

Answer:

The correct answer is C.) The tax money supports public programs and services.

Explanation:

In addition to paying government workers salaries, tax dollars help support and fund public services, such as libraries and parks.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why do you think the Phoenicians created so many colonies in the Mediterranean?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the slave trade affect europe and africa
    12·1 answer
  • Generals Grant and Sherman provided very lenient terms of surrender to the Confederate forces of Lee and Johnston in order to:__
    6·1 answer
  • PLS HURRY, TAKING A QUIZ!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
    14·2 answers
  • What is the name given to someone who helps other for no pay 1) professional 2) lay person 3) expert 4) volunteer
    10·2 answers
  • Can someone please help me with this one
    11·1 answer
  • How did the French revolution cast off the ancient regime​
    10·1 answer
  • Tại sao nói con người là nghệ sĩ
    13·1 answer
  • What would happen if we have anything taxes? how would that affect life?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement is true of most World War II African American military units?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!